Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-12-20 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Notices

Notices. Closure of a portion of a Commission hearing

487 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/12/20/04-27805·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731-TA-1069 (Final)] In the Matter of Outboard Engines From Japan; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct a Portion of the Hearing in Camera AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Closure of a portion of a Commission hearing. SUMMARY: Upon request of respondents American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda Motor Co., Ltd., American Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor Corporation, Nissan Marine Co., Ltd., Tohatsu America Corporation, Tohatsu Corporation, and Tohatsu Marine Corporation, and Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., Yamaha Marine Company, Ltd., and Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
(collectively “Japanese Respondents”), the Commission has determined to conduct a portion of its hearing in the above-captioned investigation scheduled for December 14, 2004, *in camera. See* Commission rules 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4) (19 CFR 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the hearing will be open to the public. The Commission has determined that the seven-day advance notice of the change to a meeting was not possible. *See* Commission rule 201.35(a), (c)(1) (19 CFR 201.35(a), (c)(1)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen V. Driscoll, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202)205-3092. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on
(202)205-3105. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission believes that Japanese Respondents have justified the need for a closed session. Japanese Respondents seek a closed session to allow for a discussion of business proprietary purchasing, pricing, and financial information. In making this decision, the Commission nevertheless reaffirms its belief that whenever possible its business should be conducted in public. The hearing will include the usual public presentations by the petitioners and by respondents, with questions from the Commission. In addition, the hearing will include a 10-minute *in camera* session for a confidential presentation by respondents followed by a 10-minute *in camera* rebuttal presentation by petitioners. Questions from the Commission relating to the BPI will follow each of the *in camera* presentations. During the in camera session the room will be cleared of all persons except those who have been granted access to BPI under a Commission administrative protective order
(APO)and are included on the Commission's APO service list in this investigation. See 19 CFR 201.35(b)(1), (2). The time for the parties' presentations and rebuttals in the *in camera* session will be taken from their respective overall allotments for the hearing. All persons planning to attend the *in camera* portions of the hearing should be prepared to present proper identification. Authority: The Acting General Counsel has certified, pursuant to Commission Rule 201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion, a portion of the Commission's hearing in Outboard Engines from Japan, Inv. No. 731-TA-1069 (Final), may be closed to the public to prevent the disclosure of BPI. By order of the Commission. Issued: December 14, 2004. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 04-27805 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Closure of a portion of a Commission hearing
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.