Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-12-17 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule

592 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/12/17/04-27657·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 04-27657 · R04-OAR-2004-KY-0001-200425(b); FRL-7848-8 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

Today's action consists of two distinct but related final rulemakings briefly characterized here and further discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the direct final rule for this action. First, EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Edmonson County portion of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, in draft form, on February 19, 2004, and in final form on August 24, 2004. The August 24, 2004, SIP revision provides the 10-year update to the original 1-hour ozone maintenance plans for three 1-hour ozone maintenance areas, including the Edmonson County Maintenance Area, and also provides revised 2004 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) and establishes 2015 MVEBs. Through this action, EPA is providing notification of its determination that the Edmonson County portion of the Commonwealth's SIP revision satisfies the requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990 for the 10-year update of the 1-hour ozone maintenance plan for Edmonson County Maintenance Area. Secondly, EPA is providing information on the status of its transportation conformity adequacy determination for the new MVEBs for the year 2015 that are contained in the 10-year update to the 1-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Edmonson County Area. In today's action, EPA is only addressing the portion of the SIP revision for Edmonson County. EPA will take separate action to address the other portions of the SIP revision. In the final rules section of this Federal Register , the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no significant, material, and adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.

Dates

Written comments must be received on or before January 18, 2005.

Supplementary Information

For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the rules section of this Federal Register . Dated: November 29, 2004. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 04-27657 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.