Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

3,445 words·~16 min read·/register/2004/11/18/04-25635·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-50655; File No. SR-CBOE-2004-04] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. To Amend its Guaranteed Participation Rule Relating to Facilitation and Crossing Transactions November 10, 2004. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on January 16, 2004, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.

(“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. On November 3, 2004, CBOE submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. 3 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Letter from Stephen Youhn, Legal Division, CBOE, to Nancy J.

Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission, dated November 2, 2004 (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing in its entirety. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change CBOE proposes to amend its guaranteed participation rule relating to facilitation and crossing transactions. The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Additions are *italicized* .

Deletions are bracketed. Rule 6.74. “Crossing” Orders (a)-(c) No change.

(d)* * *

(i)No change.

(ii)[The percentage of the order which a Floor Broker is entitled to cross, a] *A* fter all public customer orders that were

(1)on the limit order book and then

(2)represented in the trading crowd at the time the market was established have been satisfied, [is determined as follows:] *the Floor Broker will be entitled to cross 40% of the remaining contracts, provided the order trades at or between the best bid or offer given by the crowd in response to the broker's initial request for a market.* [(A) 20% of the remaining contracts in the order if the order is traded at the best bid or offer given by the crowd in response to the broker's initial request for a market; or

(B)40% of the remaining contracts in the order if the order is traded between the best bid or offer given by the crowd in response to the broker's initial request for a market.] (iii)-(iv) No change.

(v)If a trade pursuant to this paragraph

(d)occurs at the DPM's principal bid or offer in its appointed class, then the DPM's guaranteed participation level which is established pursuant to Exchange Rule 8.87 [(or Exchange circulars issued pursuant to Exchange Rule 8.87)] shall apply only to the number of contracts remaining after the following orders have been satisfied: those public customer orders which trade ahead of the cross transaction as indicated in sub-paragraph (d)(ii) above, and any portion of a customer order being crossed against the original order or the firm facilitation order as described in sub-paragraph (d)(ii) being represented by the Floor Broker. [The DPM's guaranteed participation may only be 25% for orders crossed pursuant to this paragraph unless the Floor Broker has chosen to cross less than its 20% entitlement, in which case the DPM's guaranteed entitlement] *DPMs are not entitled to any guaranteed participation for trades occurring pursuant to this paragraph

(d)unless the Floor Broker crosses less than its guaranteed 40%, in which case the DPM's guarantee* will be a percentage that *when* combined with the percentage the firm crossed *,* [is no more than] *does not exceed* 40% of the order. If the trade occurs at a price other than the DPM's principal bid or offer, the DPM is entitled to no guaranteed participation. (vi)-(vii) No change.

(e)No change. Interpretations and Policies * * * .01-.08 No change. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose CBOE Rule 6.74, Crossing Orders, provides the procedures for crossing and facilitation orders. Paragraph

(d)of that rule details the procedures for the Exchange's “guaranteed” crossing rule. In short, paragraph

(d)enables a floor broker to cross 20% of an order if it matches the crowd's price or 40% of an order if it improves upon the crowd's price (“20/40% rule”). Recently, the Exchange has begun to lose orders to another Exchange that is more crossing and facilitation friendly to order flow providers. To remain competitive, CBOE proposes to amend its 20/40% rule to make it a straight 40% rule, as described below. Under the proposal, floor brokers would be entitled to cross 40% of an order, provided it trades at a price that matches or improves upon the price given by the trading crowd in response to the broker's initial request for a market. All other requirements would remain the same ( *e.g.,* customer priority, minimum order size, etc.). To effect this change, CBOE proposes to amend CBOE Rule 6.74(d)(ii) by removing subparagraphs

(A)and

(B)and replacing them with a new paragraph (D)(ii) that states: “After all public customer orders that were

(1)on the limit order book and then

(2)represented in the trading crowd at the time the market was established have been satisfied, the floor broker will be entitled to cross 40% of the remaining contracts, provided the order trades at or between the best bid or offer given by the crowd in response to the broker's initial request for a market.” The procedure for facilitating orders would remain the same. The only change would be to the size of the firm's guaranteed entitlement, which would go from 20% to 40%. Changing to a straight 40% rule would require corresponding changes to the DPM participation entitlement as it pertains to facilitation and crossing orders. Currently, CBOE Rule 6.74(d)(v) entitles the DPM to a participation entitlement of 20% of the original order size when the floor broker crosses its 20% at the crowd's price. If the floor broker improves upon the crowd's price and takes its 40%, the DPM is not entitled to any participation guarantee. The Exchange proposes to retain this limitation ( *i.e.,* that the percentage of the entitlement when combined with the amount of the order the floor broker crosses may not exceed 40%), recognizing that in most instances the effect of this rule change would be that DPMs would not be entitled to participation guarantees (because the facilitating firm typically would take its 40% guaranteed amount). Necessary changes have been made to the proposed rule language to reflect this important limitation. Competitive pressures mandate the change from a 20/40% rule to a straight 40% rule. International Securities Exchange (“ISE”) Rule 716(d)(ii) provides Electronic Access Members with at least forty percent (40%) of the original size of the order for orders they submit through ISE's facilitation mechanism, whether executed at the current ISE displayed price or a better price. Accordingly, member firms have a strong inducement to send to the ISE orders they would like to facilitate. Recently, the Pacific Exchange received approval of rule filing SR-PCX-2003-64 in which it too adopted a straight 40% rule. 4 Accordingly, CBOE represents that this proposal is necessary to remain competitive in the facilitation arena. 4 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50473 (September 29, 2004), 69 FR 60206 (October 7, 2004). 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act. 5 Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the section 6(b)(5) 6 requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose a burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** or within such longer period

(i)as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or

(ii)as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:

(A)By order approve such proposed rule change; or

(B)Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov* . Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2004-04 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2004-04. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of CBOE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2004-04 and should be submitted on or before December 9, 2004. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 7 7 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E4-3247 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-50657; File No. SR-CHX-2004-34] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Membership Dues and Fees November 12, 2004. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice hereby is given that on September 28, 2004, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated (“CHX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act, 3 and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder, 4 as establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2). I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The CHX proposes to amend its membership dues and fees schedule (“Fee Schedule”) to eliminate the specialist application fee and suspend through December 31, 2004, specialist assignment fees when dual trading system securities are assigned to specialist firms without competition. Proposed new language is *italicized* ; deletions are [bracketed]. Membership Dues and Fees A.-C. No change to text. D. Specialist Assignment Fees Specialist Application Fee: $150 per application, provided, however, that there will be no application fee for [NASDAQ/NM Securities] *securities* that are assigned without competition. Assignment of Dual Trading: Once the Committee on Specialist System Securities Assignment and Evaluation approves a member organization to act as specialist in a security, that member organization must pay the following fee: *No charge through December 31, 2004.* $350 *effective January 1, 2005.* If the security was assigned without competition. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose In August 2004, the Exchange's Board of Governors decided to eliminate the application and assignment fees charged to specialist firms that seek to trade a Nasdaq/NM security when that security is assigned without competition. 5 The Exchange now proposes to similarly eliminate the application fee charged to specialist firms that seek to trade a dual trading system security, when the security is assigned without competition. The Exchange also proposes to suspend, through December 31, 2004, the assignment fees charged to those firms when dual trading system securities are assigned without competition. 6 5 The Exchange decided to continue to charge specialist assignment fees with respect to securities that are assigned to a specialist firm in competition with other firms, reflecting the increased administrative costs associated with allocating stocks in competition. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50616 (November 1, 2004). 6 Under the Exchange's rules, dual trading system securities are securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or on markets other than the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. The CHX represents that these proposed changes, like the similar proposal to modify these fees for specialists that trade Nasdaq/NM securities, 7 are designed to encourage specialist firms to trade additional securities by allowing them to do so without absorbing additional costs. The Exchange believes that these changes to the Fee Schedule provide specialists with an appropriate incentive to increase the number of issues they trade (consistent with their duties as specialists), which could allow the Exchange's members to offer their customers access to a wider array of specialist-traded securities. The Exchange has proposed to suspend the assignment fee for issues assigned without competition only through the end of the year to determine, among other things, whether the fee suspension has the intended effect. These fee changes became effective on October 1, 2004. 7 *See supra,* note 5. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act, 8 in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act, 9 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members. 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 9 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(4). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder, 11 because it establishes or changes a due, fee or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. 12 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 11 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2). 12 *Id.* IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include File Number SR-CHX-2004-34 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2004-34. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the CHX. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2004-34 and should be submitted on or before December 9, 2004. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 13 13 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E4-3248 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 4872] Notice of Meeting; United States International Telecommunication Advisory Committee Information Meeting on the World Summit on the Information Society The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC). The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Department on matters related to telecommunication and information policy matters in preparation for international meetings pertaining to telecommunication and information issues. The ITAC will meet to discuss the matters related to the second phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). The meeting will take place on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 from 10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. in the lecture room of the Historic National Academy of Science Building. The National Academy of Sciences is located at 2100 C St. NW., Washington, DC. Members of the public are welcome to participate and may join in the discussions, subject to the discretion of the Chair. Persons planning to attend this meeting should send the following data by fax to

(202)647-5957 or e-mail to *jillsonad@state.gov* not later than 24 hours before the meeting:

(1)Name of the meeting,

(2)your name, and

(3)organizational affiliation. A valid photo ID must be presented to gain entrance to the National Academy of Sciences Building. Directions to the meeting location may be obtained by calling the ITAC Secretariat at 202 647-5205 or e-mail to *jillsonad@state.gov.* Dated: November 4, 2004. Anne Jillson, Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State. [FR Doc. 04-25635 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4

Traces to 4 documents

U.S. Code

CFR