Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-10-25 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

490 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/10/25/04-23761·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 04-23761 · 21 CFR 520

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a supplemental abbreviated new animal drug application (ANADA) filed by Phoenix Scientific, Inc. The supplemental ANADA provides for use of oral praziquantel tablets for the removal of certain tapeworm parasites in dogs.

Dates

This rule is effective October 25, 2004.

Supplementary Information

Phoenix Scientific, Inc., 3915 South 48th St. Ter., St. Joseph, MO 64503, filed a supplement to ANADA 200-265 that provides for use of PRAZI-C (praziquantel) Tablets for the removal of certain tapeworm parasites in dogs. Phoenix Scientific, Inc.'s PRAZI-C Tablets are approved as a generic copy of Bayer HealthCare LLC's Tape Worm Tabs approved under NADA 111-798. The supplemental ANADA is approved as of September 15, 2004, and the regulations are amended in 21 CFR 520.1870 to reflect the approval. The basis of approval is discussed in the freedom of information summary. In accordance with the freedom of information provisions of 21 CFR part 20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a summary of safety and effectiveness data and information submitted to support approval of this application may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(a)(1) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.” Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 Animal drugs. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is amended as follows: PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. 2. Section 520.1870 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows: § 520.1870 Praziquantel tablets. (b) * * * (2) No. 059130 for use of the product described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, as in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Dated: October 14, 2004. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. 04-23761 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 5
3 references not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 520
  • 21 CFR 20
  • 5 USC 801-808
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite21 CFR 520
Cite21 CFR 20
Cite5 USC 801-808
Cites 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.