Proposed Rules. Extension of approval of an information collection; comment request
2,335 words·~11 min read·
/register/2004/09/29/04-21771A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P 69 188 Wednesday, September 29, 2004 Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service [Docket No. 04-086-1] Notice of Request for Extension of Approval of an Information Collection AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Extension of approval of an information collection; comment request. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's intention to request an extension of approval of an information collection associated with the importation into the United States of restricted and controlled animal and poultry products and byproducts, organisms, and vectors.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before November 29, 2004. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: *EDOCKET:* Go to *http://www.epa.gov/feddocket* to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once you have entered EDOCKET, click on the “View Open APHIS Dockets” link to locate this document. *Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:* Please send four copies of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. 04-086-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.
Please state that your comment refers to Docket No. 04-086-1. *E-mail:* Address your comment to *regulations@aphis.usda.gov* . Your comment must be contained in the body of your message; do not send attached files. Please include your name and address in your message and “Docket No. 04-086-1” on the subject line. *Agency Web site:* Go to *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/cominst.html* for a form you can use to submit an e-mail comment through the APHIS Web site. *Reading Room:* You may read any comments that we receive on this docket in our reading room.
The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call
(202)690-2817 before coming. *Other Information:* You may view APHIS documents published in the **Federal Register** and related information, including the names of groups and individuals who have commented on APHIS dockets, on the Internet at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor.html* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding regulations for the importation into the United States of restricted and controlled materials, contact Dr. Tracye Butler, Senior Staff Veterinarian, Technical Services Unit, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1232;
(301)734-7476. For copies of more detailed information on the information collection, contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS* Information Collection Coordinator, at
(301)734-7477. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Importation of Restricted and Controlled Animal and Poultry Products and Byproducts, Organisms, and Vectors into the United States. *OMB Number:* 0579-0015. *Type of Request:* Extension of approval of an information collection. *Abstract:* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture regulates the importation of certain animal and poultry products and byproducts, organisms, and vectors under 9 CFR parts 94, 95, 96, and 122 to prevent the introduction and spread of livestock and poultry diseases into the United States. To accomplish this, we must collect information from a variety of individuals, both within and outside the United States, who are involved in handling, transporting, and importing these items. Collecting this information is critical to our mission of ensuring that these imported items do not present a disease risk to the livestock and poultry populations of the United States. Collecting this information requires us to use a number of forms and documents, which are described below. *VS Form 16-3 (Application for Permit to Import Controlled Materials/Import or Transport Organisms or Vectors)* is the application and agreement form used by individuals seeking a permit. *VS Form 16-25 (Application for Approval or Report of Inspection of Establishments Handling Restricted Animal Byproducts or Controlled Materials.* This is a dual purpose form. It is an application for U.S. establishments requesting approval to handle restricted imported animal byproducts and controlled materials. It also serves as a report of inspections of establishments to ensure that restricted and controlled imports are being handled in compliance with our requirements. *VS Form 16-26 (Agreement for Handling Restricted Imports of Animal Byproducts and Controlled Materials).* This is a form signed by an operator of a U.S. establishment wishing to handle restricted or controlled materials in which the operator agrees to comply with all requirements for handling the restricted and controlled materials. *Certificates.* Certain animal and poultry products must have a certificate from the national government of the exporting country to be eligible for importation into the United States. These certificates are required to verify that the animal or poultry products meet the sanitary requirements of our regulations (e.g., originated from disease-free animals and from animals native to the country of origin, or were prepared in a certain manner in an approved establishment). The certificate, signed by a full-time salaried veterinary official from the country of origin, or other authorized person, provides us with information that enables us to determine whether an article meets our requirements for importation. *Seals.* Certain animal or poultry products and byproducts must be shipped in sealed containers or holds to ensure that the integrity of the shipment is not violated. The seals must be numbered, the numbers of the seals must be recorded on the government certificate that accompanies the shipment, and the seals must not have been tampered with. Federal inspectors at ports of entry inspect the seals and verify that the seals are intact and that the numbers match those on the certificates. *Compliance agreement, recordkeeping requirements.* Certain animal or poultry products and byproducts are required to be processed in a certain manner in an establishment in a foreign country before being exported to the United States. We require an official of the processing plant to sign a written agreement prepared by APHIS. By signing this agreement, this official certifies that the animal products being exported to the United States have been processed in a manner approved by APHIS, and that adequate records of these exports are being maintained. *Marking requirements.* Before certain animal products may enter the United States, they must be marked, with an ink stamp or brand, to indicate that the products have originated from an approved meat processing establishment and have been inspected by appropriate veterinary authorities. The mark is applied to the meat product by processing plant personnel. *Foreign meat inspection certificate for importation of fresh meat from regions free of foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest, but subject to certain restrictions due to their proximity to, or trading relationships with, regions where foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest exists.* This certificate, completed by a veterinary official of the exporting region, provides specific information regarding the establishment where the animals were slaughtered, the origin of the animals, and the processing and handling of the meat or other animal products. *Certification of a national government for importation of pork or pork products from a swine vesicular disease-free region.* This is a statement, completed by a government official of an exporting region, certifying that the U.S.-destined pork or pork product originated in a region that is free from swine vesicular disease. *Cleaning and disinfecting methods.* This is a letter from veterinary officials of an exporting region stating that appropriate cleaning and disinfecting methods have been applied to trucks, railroad cars, or other means of conveyance used to transport certain animal products destined for the United States. We are asking the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)to approve our use of these information collection activities for an additional 3 years. The purpose of this notice is to solicit comments from the public (as well as affected agencies) concerning this information collection. These comments will help us:
(1)Evaluate whether the information collection is necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2)Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the information collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use, as appropriate, of automated, electronic, mechanical, and other collection technologies, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. *Estimate of burden:* The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.39955 hours per response. *Respondents:* Importers, exporters, shippers, foreign animal health authorities, owner/operators of establishments (domestic and foreign) that handle restricted and controlled materials. *Estimated annual number of respondents:* 10,008. *Estimated annual number of responses per respondent:* 7.0029. *Estimated annual number of responses:* 70,086. *Estimated total annual burden on respondents:* 28,003 hours. (Due to averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per response.) All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of September 2004. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E4-2409 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-34-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Commodity Credit Corporation Domestic Sugar Program—2003 Crop Cane Sugar and Sugar Beet Marketing Allotments and Company Allocations AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC)is issuing this notice which sets forth the establishment and adjustments to the sugar overall allotment quantity for the 2003 crop year (FY 2004), which runs from October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004. Although CCC already has announced all of the information in this notice, CCC is statutorily required to publish in the **Federal Register** determinations establishing or adjusting sugar marketing allotments. CCC set the 2003 crop overall allotment quantity
(OAQ)of domestic sugar to 8.550 million short tons raw value
(STRV)on August 13, 2003. On September 30, 2003, CCC allocated only 96.5% of this amount, resulting in a beet sugar sector allotment of 4.484 million STRV and a cane sugar sector allotment of 3.766 million STRV. At that time, CCC also announced the allotments to cane-producing States and allocations to cane and beet sugar processors and set the proportionate share requirement on Louisiana cane sugar producers for the 2003 crop at 84.2 percent. On April 9, 2004, CCC officially reduced the OAQ to 8.250 million STRV and revised State cane sugar allotments and cane sugar processor allocations to reflect updated FY 2004 raw cane production forecasts. On July 22, 2004, CCC revised State cane sugar allotments to reflect further updated raw cane production forecasts. ADDRESSES: Barbara Fecso, Dairy and Sweeteners Analysis Group, Economic Policy and Analysis Staff, Farm Service Agency, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0516, Washington, DC 20250-0516; telephone
(202)720-4146; FAX
(202)690-1480; e-mail: *barbara.fecso@usda.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Fecso at
(202)720-4146. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 359b(b)(1) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1359bb(a)(1)), requires the Secretary to establish, by the beginning of each crop year, an appropriate allotment for the marketing by processors of sugar processed from sugar beets and from domestically produced cane sugar at a level the Secretary estimates will result in no forfeitures of sugar to the CCC under the loan program. When CCC announced a 8.550 million ton OAQ in August 2003, it noted the existence of sugar market uncertainties and that the OAQ could be adjusted if warranted. The September 11, 2003, USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates forecast substantially decreased total use in FY 2003 and FY 2004. Consequently, the FY 2004 free ending stocks-to-use ratio increased to 17.4 percent, up from 15.1 percent when the OAQ was established. Free ending stocks refer to the portion of stocks that are permitted to be sold under the sugar marketing allotment program. In response, CCC allocated 96.5 percent of the OAQ in September 2003 to reduce the free ending stocks-to-use ratio closer to levels associated with a more balanced market. In April 2004, CCC reevaluated estimates of sugar consumption, stocks, production, and imports and determined that 3.5 percent of the OAQ, or 300,000 tons, that was not allocated in September would not be needed for a balanced market in FY 2004. Thus, the official OAQ was reduced by 300,000 tons. In July 2004, CCC again revised State cane sugar allotments to reflect updated production estimates. To establish cane state allotments, weights of 25 percent, 25 percent, and 50 percent, respectively, are assigned to the three-factor criteria: Past marketings; processing capacity; and ability to market. Because Puerto Rice forecast zero production for the 2003 crop, its FY 2004 allotment was reassigned to all other cane processors based on their respective three-factor proportionate shares. Proportionate shares relative to the acreage of cane sugar that may be harvested in Louisiana for sugar or seed is set at 84.2 percent of each farm's cane sugar acreage base. These actions apply to all domestic sugar marketed for human consumption in the United States from October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004. The established 2003 crop beet and cane sugar marketing allotments are listed in the following table, along with the adjustments that have occurred since: FY 2004 Overall Beet/Cane Allotments—Establishment and Adjustments August 13, 2003 announcement establishing FY04 allotments at 8,550,000 STRV September 30, 2003 announcement revising FY04 allotments to 8,250,000 STRV April 9, 2004 announcement adjusting FY04 allotments July 22, 2004 announcmeent adjusting FY04 allotments Beet sugar 4,646,925 4,483,875 Cane sugar 3,903,075 3,766,124 Total OAQ 8,550,000 8,250,000 State cane sugar alltoments: Florida 1,877,086 1,910,863 1,949,112 Louisiana 1,411,954 1,376,626 1,403,800 Texas 157,617 159,230 157,256 Hawaii 319,468 319,406 255,956 Puerto Rico 0 0 0 Signed in Washington, DC on September 3, 2004. James R. Little, Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation. [FR Doc. 04-21771 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Extension of approval of an information collection; comment request
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources