Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-09-02 · National Aeronautics and Space Administration · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

493 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/09/02/04-20074·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 04-20074 · RIN 2700-AD02 · 48 CFR 1871

Summary

This final rule revises the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) by removing Part 1871, MidRange Procurement Procedures. The FAR provides contracting officers with broad discretion and flexibility in the source selection process in order to achieve a best value outcome. A separate NASA MidRange process is no longer necessary. EFFECTIVE DATE: September 2, 2004.

Supplementary Information

The Office of Federal Procurement Policy approved a test of NASA's MidRange Procurement Procedures in 1993. The objective of the test was to reduce the leadtime and effort associated with the conduct of acquisitions between $25,000 (the small purchase threshold at that time) and $500,000. OFPP test approval was needed to utilize electronic commerce to publicize and post solicitations along with a waiver to the publicizing/response times required by the FAR. Subsequent changes increased the threshold to $10,000,000 for non-commercial items and $25,000,000 for commercial items. The test portion of MidRange procedures (waiver of publicizing/response times) expired in 1997. The MidRange procedures are no longer unique and all the source selection methodologies under NFS Part 1871, MidRange, are directly traceable to FAR Parts 12, 14, and 15. Therefore, retaining a separate NASA MidRange process is no longer necessary. A. Regulatory Flexibility Act Removing Part 1871—Midrange Procurement Procedures does not have an impact beyond the internal operating procedures of NASA. The FAR provides contracting officers with broad discretion and the flexibility in the source selection process needed to achieve a best value outcome. The current Midrange Procurement procedure is now redundant of the flexibilities provided by the FAR. Therefore, this final rule does not constitute a significant revision within the meaning of FAR 1.501 and Public Law 98-577, and publication for public comment is not required. However, NASA will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected NFS Part 1871 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. B. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes do not impose recordkeeping or information collection requirements which require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1871 Government procurement. Tom Luedtke, Assistant Administrator for Procurement. PART 1871—MIDRANGE PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES Accordingly, under the authority of The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (Pub. L. 85-568; 42 U.S.C. 2451 et seq. ), remove 48 CFR Part 1871. [FR Doc. 04-20074 Filed 9-1-04; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
4 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 1871
  • Pub. L. 98-577
  • Pub. L. 85-568
  • 42 USC 2451
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 1871
Pub. L.Pub. L. 98-577
Pub. L.Pub. L. 85-568
Cite42 USC 2451
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.