Notices. Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U
912 words·~4 min read·
/register/2004/08/31/04-19854A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4312—52—M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-523] In the Matter of Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and Chipsets and Products Containing the Same, Including DVD Players and PC Optical Storage Devices II; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 23, 2004, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of MediaTek Corporation of Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan.
A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on August 16, 2004. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain optical disk controller chips and chipsets by reason of infringement of claims 1, 3-6, and 8-10 of U.S. Patent No. 5,970,031 and claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,229,773. The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that a domestic industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, as supplemented, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on
(202)205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202)205-2576. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2003). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, as supplemented, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 24, 2004, *Ordered That* —
(1)Pursuant to subsection
(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of optical disk controller chips or chipsets or products containing same, including DVD players and PC optical storage devices, by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 3-6, and 8-10 of U.S. Patent No. 5,970,031 and claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,229,773, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a)The complainant is— MediaTek, Inc., 5F, No. 1-2, Innovation Road 1, Science Based Industrial Park, Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan.
(b)The respondents are the following companies alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Zoran Corporation, 1390 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94806-5305. Oak Technology, Inc., 1390 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94806-5305.
(c)David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and
(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Delbert R. Terrill, Jr., is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. A response to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against such respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 26, 2004. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 04-19854 Filed 8-30-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources