Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-08-26 · Federal Election Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Rulemaking petition: notice of availability

678 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/08/26/04-19526·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Election Commission
Action: Rulemaking petition: notice of availability
Citation: FR Doc. 04-19526 · NOTICE 2004-12 · 11 CFR 100

Summary

On July 20, 2004, the Commission received a Petition for Rulemaking (“Petition”) from Mr. Robert F. Bauer (“Petitioner”). The Petition asks the Commission to revise its regulations by exempting the promotion of political documentary films that may otherwise meet the requirements of an electioneering communication within the meaning of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). The Petition is available for inspection in the Commission's Public Records Office, through its Faxline service, and on its Web site, . Further information is provided in the supplementary information that follows.

Dates

Statements in support of, or in opposition to, the Petition must be submitted on or before September 27, 2004.

Supplementary Information

The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) has received a Petition for Rulemaking from Mr. Robert F. Bauer, acting on his own behalf and not on behalf of any client or other interested party. Petitioner asks the Commission to revise 11 CFR 100.29(c) to exempt from the term “electioneering communications” any communication appearing in a promotion for a political documentary film “by corporations and other entities established and operating for such purpose in the ordinary course of their businesses,” provided that the promotion does not “promote, support, attack or oppose” a candidate for federal office within the meaning of 2 U.S.C. 431(20)(A)(iii). Petitioner seeks to have any such protections also apply to the promotion, in the ordinary course of business, of “books, plays, and other forms of political expression that may involve references to Federal candidates.” The Commission seeks comments on whether the Commission should initiate a rulemaking on “electioneering communications” and on whether there are other issues regarding the electioneering communications rules that should also be addressed in a rulemaking at this time. 1 1 Certain aspects of the Commission's regulations regarding electioneering communications are the subject of a pending lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Shays and Meehan v. FEC , Civ. Act. 02-CV-1984. Copies of the Petition are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Records Office, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, Monday though Friday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., and on the Commission's Web site, . Interested persons may also obtain a copy of the Petition at any time by dialing the Commission's Faxline service at (202) 501-3413 and requesting document # 257. Consideration of the merits of the Petition will be deferred until the close of the comment period. If the Commission decides that the Petition has merit, it may begin a rulemaking proceeding. Any subsequent action taken by the Commission will be announced in the Federal Register . Dated: August 20, 2004. Bradley A. Smith, Chairman, Federal Election Commission. [FR Doc. 04-19526 Filed 8-25-04; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 11 CFR 100
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Rulemaking petition: notice of availability
Cite11 CFR 100
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.