Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-08-23 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

432 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/08/23/04-19099

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-54,695] C-Cor Corporation, Repair Services Department, Meriden, Connecticut; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application postmarked June 17, 2004, petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
The denial notice applicable to workers of C-Cor Corporation, Repair Services Department, Meriden, Connecticut was signed on May 25, 2004, and published in the **Federal Register** on June 17, 2004 (69 FR 33941). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:
(1)If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2)If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3)If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition was filed on behalf of workers at C-Cor Corporation, Repair Services Department, Meriden, Connecticut engaged in activities related to the repair of broadband communication products. The petition was denied because the petitioning workers did not produce an article within the meaning of section 222 of the Act. In the request for reconsideration, petitioners allege that the workers supported production of C-Cor products, namely electronic broadband equipment. They further state that the subject firm outsourced repair of its products to Mexico through the third party. A company official was contacted to clarify the work performed by the Repair Services Department. It was revealed that the subject group of workers did not support any production at the subject facility but performed repair services of the equipment produced by C-Cor Corporation in Meriden, Connecticut. The official further confirmed the fact established during the original investigation that C-Cor Corporation, Meriden, Connecticut outsourced its repair services to a non-affiliated domestic company in California, which was the cause of the job eliminations of the subject group of workers. Repair of products already purchased does not constitute production within the context of eligibility requirements for trade adjustment assistance. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of August, 2004. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 04-19099 Filed 8-20-04; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 29 CFR 90.18(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cite29 CFR 90.18(c)
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.