Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-04-09 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

528 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/04/09/04-8085·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-49517; File No. SR-CHX-2004-01] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Membership Dues and Fees April 1, 2004. On January 21, 2004, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (“CHX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to amend its membership dues and fees schedule (the “Fee Schedule”) to clarify the applicability of certain Fee Schedule provisions relating to transaction fees, and to establish a schedule of maximum monthly transaction fees for certain agency orders executed through a CHX floor broker.
The Exchange proposed to apply the Fee Schedule changes on a retroactive basis effective as of November 1, 2003. 3 On February 19, 2004, the Exchange submitted an amendment to the proposed rule change. 4 The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on March 1, 2004. 5 The Commission received no comments on the proposal. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 On December 31, 2003, the Exchange filed an identical amendment to the Fee Schedule, as immediately effective. *See* SR-CHX-2003-39.
Because the Exchange also sought to apply the Fee Schedule amendments on a retroactive basis ( *i.e.* , to the months November and December, 2003), the Exchange submitted the proposed rule change for notice and comment. 4 *See* facsimile from Ellen J. Neely, Senior Vice President & General Counsel, CHX, to A. Michael Pierson, Attorney, and Marisol Rubecindo, Law Clerk, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission, dated February 19, 2004 (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 replaced the proposed rule change in its entirety. 5 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49298 (February 23, 2004), 69 FR 9660.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange 6 and, particularly, Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, which requires that the rules of an exchange provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members. 7 The Commission believes that the Exchange's proposal to apply its current Fee Schedule on a retroactive basis to November 1, 2003, should allow the Exchange to provide eligible order-sending firms that route significant levels of order flow to the CHX a transaction fee credit.
The Commission notes that the retroactive application of the proposal will not result in the assessment of any additional fees against CHX members. 6 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change, as amended, (SR-CHX-2004-01) is approved. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 9 9 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 04-8085 Filed 4-8-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.