Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-03-30 · Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), Interior · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period

1,120 words·~5 min read·/register/2004/03/30/04-6985·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), Interior
Action: Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 04-6985 · KY-244-FOR · 30 CFR 917

Summary

We are reopening the public comment period on a proposed amendment to the Kentucky regulatory program (the “Kentucky program”) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Kentucky has submitted additional information in the form of an actuarial report. The report is an actuarial analysis of the Kentucky Bond Pool Fund performed by the Madison Consulting Group.

Dates

We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m., e.s.t., April 14, 2004.

Supplementary Information

I. Background on the Kentucky Program II. Description of the Proposed Amendment III. Public Comment Procedures I. Background on the Kentucky Program Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that its program includes, among other things, “a State law which provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in accordance with the requirements of the Act* * *; and rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to the Act.” See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a) (1) and (7). On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Kentucky program on May 18, 1982. You can find background information on the Kentucky program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of the Kentucky program in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 21434). You can also find later actions concerning Kentucky's program and program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11, 917.12, 917.13, 917.15, 917.16, and 917.17. II. Description of the Proposed Amendment By letter dated May 22, 2003, Kentucky sent us a proposed amendment to its program ([KY-244], Administrative Record No. KY-1580) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq. ). Kentucky submitted a portion of House Bill 269, the executive branch budget bill, promulgated by the 2003 Kentucky General Assembly. Specifically, Kentucky proposes to transfer $3,000,000 from the Bond Pool Fund (the Fund) established in Kentucky Revised Statute 350.700 to the Commonwealth's General Fund for the 2002-2003 fiscal year. The transfer appears on page 225, line 21 and is listed under Part V, Section J, item 5 of House Bill 269. The full text of the program amendment is available for you to read at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES. We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the July 16, 2003, Federal Register (68 FR 41980), and in the same document invited public comment and provided an opportunity for a public hearing on the adequacy of the proposed amendment. The public comment period closed on August 15, 2003. Please refer to the July 16, 2003, Federal Register , for additional background information. By letter dated July 10, 2003, we requested additional information from Kentucky in the form of a financial analysis (Administrative Record No. KY-1584). We asked that the analysis specifically demonstrate that the transfer of funds would not adversely impact the Fund's ability to complete the reclamation plan for any area which may be in default at any time as required by 30 CFR 800.11(e). By letter dated August 14, 2003, Kentucky responded by stating the Madison Consulting Group would perform an actuarial review of the Fund (Administrative Record No. KY-1599). By letter dated March 3, 2004, the Department for Natural Resources (formerly the Department for Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement) transmitted the Kentucky Bond Pool Actuarial Report to us (Administrative Record No. KY-1615). The actuarial review covers the time period July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003. The full text is available for you to read at the locations listed above at ADDRESSES. The key findings of the report are summarized here. The report concluded that the Fund: 1. Should be able to “reasonably withstand the failure of any two of its member companies” to be actuarially sound and viable on a long-term basis (p. 7); 2. is “currently not able to reasonably provide for the ‘two failure’ funding scenario up to a 75 percent confidence level” (p. 8); 3. needs to increase its assets “so as to provide for potential liabilities and future growth” (p. 8); and 4. is in a less favorable financial situation than the last analysis completed for the period ending June 30, 2000 (p. 8). III. Public Comment Procedures Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it will become part of the program. Written Comments Send your written comments to OSM at the address given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of your recommendations. In the final rulemaking, we will not necessarily consider or include in the administrative record any comments received after the time indicated under DATES or at locations other than the Lexington Field Office. Availability of Comments We will make comments, including names and addresses of respondents, available for public review during normal business hours. We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public review in their entirety. List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917 Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining. Dated: March 10, 2004. Michael K. Robinson, Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center. [FR Doc. 04-6985 Filed 3-29-04; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.