Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-01-28 · National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Termination of rulemaking

751 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/01/28/04-1645

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 57l [Docket No. NHTSA-1999-3705] RIN 2127-AG16 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Door Locks and Door Retention Components AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation. ACTION: Termination of rulemaking. SUMMARY: On August 25, 1995, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received a petition for rulemaking from Independent Mobility Systems
(IMS)requesting that the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 206, “Door Locks and Door Retention Components,” be modified to exclude retention components on doors modified for use with wheelchair ramp systems. NHTSA granted the IMS petition on May 31, 1996. This notice discusses our decision to terminate rulemaking on this petition. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The following persons may be contacted at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590: *For Technical Issues:* Mr. Maurice Hicks, Office of Crashworthiness Standards, NVS-113, telephone
(202)366-6345, facsimile
(202)366-4329, electronic mail: *maurice.hicks@nhtsa.dot.gov.* *For Legal Issues:* Ms. Rebecca MacPherson, Office of the Chief Counsel
(202)366-2992, facsimile
(202)366-2260, electronic mail: *rebecca.macpherson@nhtsa.dot.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may read the materials placed in the docket for this notice ( *e.g.* , the August 25, 1995, IMS petition and subsequent rulemaking notices) by going to the Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. You may also read the materials on the Internet. To do so, take the following steps:
(1)Go to the Web page of the Department of Transportation DMS ( *http://dms.dot.gov/* ).
(2)On that page, click on “search” near the top of the page or scroll down to the words “Search the DMS Web” and click on them.
(3)On the next page ( *http://dms.dot.gov/search/* ), scroll down to “Docket Number” and type in the four-digit docket number shown in the title at the beginning of this notice. After typing the docket number, click on “search.”
(4)On the next page (“Docket Summary Information”), which contains docket summary information for the materials in the docket you selected, scroll down to “search results” and click on the desired materials. You may download the materials. Background NHTSA received a petition for rulemaking from Independent Mobility System (IMS), Inc., (4100 W. Piedras Street, Farmington, New Mexico 87401) on August 25, 1995, requesting an exemption from the requirements of FMVSS No. 206 for retention components on any door modified for use with a wheelchair ramp system. IMS claimed that exempting wheelchair ramps was necessary to aid in transporting disabled persons. It justified its request on the basis that wheelchair ramps share the same purpose and configuration as wheelchair lifts, which are exempted from the standard. The petitioner stated that, as with lifts, wheelchair ramp platforms are vertically stored within the vehicle's doorway, with the purpose of creating a barrier to prevent occupant ejections. IMS requested an inclusion of the term “wheelchair ramp” along with “wheelchair lifts” in paragraph S4 of FMVSS 206. IMS asked that paragraph S4 be revised as follows: S4.
(c)Components on any side door leading directly into a compartment that contains one or more seating accommodations shall conform to this standard. However, components on folding doors, roll-up doors, doors that are designed to be easily attached to or removed from motor vehicles manufactured for operation without doors, and any side doors which are equipped with wheelchair lifts *or wheelchair ramps* and that are linked to an alarm system consisting of either a flashing visible signal located in the driver's compartment or an alarm audible to the driver that is activated when the door is open, need not conform to this standard. On May 31, 1996, NHTSA issued a **Federal Register** notice granting the IMS petition (61 FR 27325). Reason for Termination Subsequent to granting the IMS petition, the agency further investigated the installation and operational characteristics of various wheelchair lift and ramp designs. From this, it was found that:
(1)wheelchair ramps do not adequately barricade the vehicle doorway to prevent occupant ejection without functional door latches, and
(2)since 1998, wheelchair ramp designs have progressed such that it is no longer necessary to disable door retention components when installing wheelchair ramp and lift systems. Therefore, NHTSA is terminating the rulemaking that arose out of the August 1995, IMS petition. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Issued on: January 22, 2004. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 04-1645 Filed 1-27-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 57
  • 49 CFR 1.50
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Termination of rulemaking
Cite49 CFR 57
Cite49 CFR 1.50
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.