Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-01-22 · The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) · Notices

Notices. Denial of the request alleging that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabrics, for use in apparel articles, cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner under the CBTPA

673 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/01/22/04-1412

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS Denial of Commercial Availability Request Under the United States-Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA) January 15, 2004. AGENCY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA). ACTION: Denial of the request alleging that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabrics, for use in apparel articles, cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner under the CBTPA.
SUMMARY: On November 13, 2003 the Chairman of CITA received a petition from Alarmex Holdings Group, Inc. that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabric, of 220 g/m2 fabric weight, of 20's singles spun rayon yarn, of 100 X 64 construction, classified in subheading 5516.14.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), for use in apparel articles, cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. It requested that apparel of such fabrics be eligible for preferential treatment under the CBTPA.
Based on currently available information, CITA has determined that these subject fabrics can be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner and therefore denies the request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Heinzen, International Trade Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
(202)482-3400. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: Section 213(b)(2)(A)(v)(II) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, as added by Section 211(a) of the CBTPA; Section 6 of Executive Order No. 13191 of January 17, 2001. Background The CBTPA provides for quota- and duty-free treatment for qualifying textile and apparel products. Such treatment is generally limited to products manufactured from yarns and fabrics formed in the United States or a beneficiary country. The CBTPA also provides for quota- and duty-free treatment for apparel articles that are both cut (or knit-to-shape) and sewn or otherwise assembled in one or more CBTPA beneficiary countries from fabric or yarn that is not formed in the United States, if it has been determined that such fabric or yarn cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. In Executive Order No. 13191, the President delegated to CITA the authority to determine whether yarns or fabrics cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner under the CBTPA and directed CITA to establish procedures to ensure appropriate public participation in any such determination. On March 6, 2001, CITA published procedures that it will follow in considering requests. (66 FR 13502). On November 13, 2003, the Chairman of CITA received a petition from Alarmex Holdings Group, Inc. that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabric, of 220 g/m2 fabric weight, of 20's singles spun rayon yarn, of 100 X 64 construction, classified in subheading 5516.14.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner and requesting quota- and duty-free treatment under the CBTPA for apparel articles that are both cut and sewn in one or more CBTPA beneficiary countries from such fabrics. On November 19, 2003, CITA solicited public comments regarding this request (68 FR 65256), particularly with respect to whether these fabrics can be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. On December 5, 2003, CITA and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative offered to hold consultations with the relevant Congressional committees. We also requested the advice of the U.S. International Trade Commission and the relevant Industry Sector Advisory Committees. Based on the information provided, including review of the request, public comments and advice received, and our knowledge of the industry, CITA has determined that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabrics, classified in subheading 5516.14.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), for use in apparel articles, can be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. Alarmex Holdings Group's petition is denied. Philip J. Martello, Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements. [FR Doc.04-1412 Filed 1-21-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Denial of the request alleging that certain printed, 100 percent rayon, herringbone fabrics, for use in apparel articles, cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner under the CBTPA
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.