Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-01-16 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

465 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/01/16/04-1025·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-122-839] Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 16, 2004. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore at
(202)482-3692, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office VI, Group II, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Time Limits Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of a review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order/finding for which a review is requested and the final results within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within that time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary results to a maximum of 365 days and for the final results to 180 days (or 300 days if the Department does not extend the time limit for the preliminary results) from the date of the publication of the preliminary results. Background On June 26, 2003, the Department initiated an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain softwood lumber products from Canada. *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part* , 68 FR 39055 (July 1, 2003). The preliminary results are currently due no later than February 2, 2004. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review The subsidy programs covered by this review are extraordinarily complicated. Further, petitioners have made several new subsidy allegations in this review. In addition, because this administrative review is being conducted on an aggregate level, the Department must analyze large amounts of data from each of the Canadian Provinces as well as data from the Canadian Federal Government. Furthermore, the Department intends to conduct a limited number of reviews of individual companies who claimed to have received zero or *de minimis* subsidies. Therefore, the Department is extending the time limits for completion of the preliminary results to June 1, 2004. *See* the Decision Memorandum from Melissa G. Skinner, Director, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement VI, to Holly A. Kuga, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement Group II, dated concurrent with this notice, which is on file in the Central Records Unit. This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Dated: January 8, 2004. Holly A. Kuga, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement Group II. [FR Doc. 04-1025 Filed 1-15-04; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.