Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-01-05 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Proposed rule; correction

342 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/01/05/04-71·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-59-M 69 2 Monday, January 5, 2004 Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 21 and 121 [Docket No. FAA-2002-6717; Notice No. 03-11] RIN 2120-AI03 Extended Operations (ETOPS) of Multi-engine Airplanes; Correction AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document makes corrections to the proposed rule published in the **Federal Register** on November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64730), which proposes to issue regulations governing the design, maintenance, and operation of airplanes and engines for flights that go beyond certain distances from an adequate airport.
This correction is necessary to correct an inadvertent omission and incorrect numbering. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric vanOpstal,
(202)267-3774; or E-mail: *eric.vanopstal@faa.gov.* Correction In proposed rule FR Doc. 03-28407, published on November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64730), make the following corrections: 1. On page 64786, in the second column, correct § 21.4 by adding paragraph
(c)to read as follows: § 21.4 ETOPS reporting requirements.
(c)*Corrective action if in-flight shutdown rates are exceeded.* If the in-flight shutdown rate exceeds the requirements in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the certificating office of the FAA will review the in-flight shut down rate to determine if an unsafe condition that requires mandatory corrective action as specified by part 39 of this chapter exists. The rates contained in paragraph (b)(2) of this section are worldwide fleet rates applicable to ETOPS type design holders for a given airplane-engine type combination, and are not air carrier or operator specific. § 121.646 [Corrected] 2. On page 64794, in the second column, correct § 121.646(b)(3) by revising the reference “(b)(1)(i)” to read “(b)(1)” each place it appears. 3. On page 64794, in the second column, correct § 121.646 (b)(4) by revising the reference “(b)(1)(i)” to read “(b)(1)'. 4. On page 64794, in the second column, correct § 121.646 by redesignating paragraphs (b)(4)(C) and (b)(4)(D) as paragraphs
(c)and (d), respectively. Issued in Washington, DC, on December 30, 2003. Donald P. Byrne, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. [FR Doc. 04-71 Filed 1-2-04; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.