Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-29 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

530 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/12/29/03-31871·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-31871

Summary

EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District's Part 70 Operating Permits (Title V) Program. The proposed revisions address a change in the major source threshold for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NO X ). This change is based on the redesignation of San Diego County as in attainment of the federal one-hour ozone standard (see 68 FR 37976, June 26, 2003). As a result of this action, some sources that would have previously been considered major sources, and therefore would have been required to obtain a Title V operating permit, would no longer need to apply for a Title V permit. We are also approving revisions to several other parts of San Diego's Title V program. For more information see “What is being addressed in this document,” below.

Dates

Any comments on this proposal must arrive by January 28, 2004.

Supplementary Information

This proposal addresses the following Rules: 1401(c); 1410(i), (j), (l), and (q); 1418(b), (c), and (e); 1415 (a); 1421(a) and (b); and 1425(a) and (b). In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register , we are approving these rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in a subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action. Dated: December 15, 2003. Keith Takata, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 70, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 70—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended by adding under “California” paragraph (x) to read as follows: Appendix A to Part 70—Approval Status of State and Local Operating Permits Programs California (x) * * * (5) Revisions were submitted on August 19, 2003, effective February 27, 2004. [FR Doc. 03-31871 Filed 12-24-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.