Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-22 · Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

534 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/12/22/03-31400·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 03-31400 · Docket No. FR-4650-N-102

Summary

The proposed information collection requirement described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal.

Dates

Comments due: February 20, 2004.

Supplementary Information

The Department will submit the proposed information collection to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affecting agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. , permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice also lists the following information: Title of Proposal: Customer Satisfaction Surveys. OMB Control Number, if applicable: 2535-New. Respondents: Individuals, Business, or other for-profit, Not-for profit institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government. Description of the need for the information and proposed use: Executive Order 12862, “Setting Customer Service Standards” requires that Federal agencies provide the highest quality service to our customers by identifying them and determining what they think about our services. The surveys covered in the request for a generic clearance will provide HUD a means to gather this data directly from our customers. Agency form numbers, if applicable: None. Estimation of the total number of hours needed to prepare the information collection including number of respondents, frequency of response, and hours of response: The burden hours per response will vary with each survey; however, we estimate an average burden of sixty minutes for each survey. We estimate that HUD will survey respondents on occasion. Therefore, the total annual estimate is one burden hour per respondent. Status of the proposed information collection: This is a new collection. Authority: Sec. 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. Dated: December 12, 2003. Wayne Eddins, Departmental Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 03-31400 Filed 12-19-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.