Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-17 · Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA · Presidential Documents

Presidential Documents. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking

432 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/12/17/03-31092·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3410-30-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 7 CFR Part 810 Request for Public Comment on the United States Standards for Sorghum AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) is initiating a review of the United States Standards for Sorghum. GIPSA invites comments and suggested changes to these standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 17, 2004. ADDRESSES: Written comments must be submitted to Tess Butler at GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3604, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3604; faxed to
(202)690-2755; or e-mailed to *comments.gipsa@usda.gov* . Please indicate your comment refers to United States Standards for Sorghum. All comments received are available for public inspection at Room 1652, South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27 (b)). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Plaus, telephone
(202)690-3460 at GIPSA, USDA, Room 2409 North/South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3630; Fax Number
(202)720-1015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 14, 1998, GIPSA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the **Federal Register** (63 FR 43641) requesting views and comments on the sorghum standards. Based on comments received, GIPSA determined that the U.S. Standards for Sorghum were meeting the needs of producers, shippers, and others who handle and market sorghum and that no changes were needed at that time. Recently, the National Grain Sorghum Producers (NGSP), an association representing U.S. grain sorghum farmers nationwide, has requested that GIPSA initiate a review of the sorghum standards. NGSP would welcome the opportunity to clarify several definitions in the current standards to more accurately reflect advancements in sorghum genetics and better reflect what is relevant to deriving value in the marketplace. GIPSA is seeking all comments that will assist the Agency in making the standards more relevant in the contemporary market. Accordingly, GIPSA is initiating a review of the United States Standards for Sorghum in Subpart I of 7 CFR part 810 at §§ 810.1401-810.1405. During this review, GIPSA will assess the need for revisions on the various sections of the United States Standards for Sorghum, the potential for improvements, and language clarity. GIPSA invites any comments and suggestions concerning these standards, and the benefits and costs of any changes including, but not limited to, those addressing sorghum classification, definitions, and grade limits. Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 71, *et seq.* ) Donna Reifschneider, Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. [FR Doc. 03-31092 Filed 12-16-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
4 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 810
  • 7 CFR 1.27
  • Pub. L. 94-582
  • 90 Stat. 2867
Citation graph
cites case law
Presidential Documents
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite7 CFR 810
Cite7 CFR 1.27
Pub. L.Pub. L. 94-582
Stat.90 Stat. 2867
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.