Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-09 · Office of the Inspector General, DoD · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

1,108 words·~5 min read·/register/2003/12/09/03-30396·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Inspector General, DoD
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-30396 · 32 CFR 312

Summary

The Office of the Inspector General, DoD (OIG, DoD) is proposing to exempt the system of records CIG-21, entitled “Congressional Correspondence Tracking System” from 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1) through (k)(7). The exemption is needed because during the course of a Congressional inquiry, exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become part of the case records in the system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those “other” systems of records are entered into the Privacy Act case records, the Inspector General, DoD, hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those “other” systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary systems of records of which they are a part. In addition, two administrative changes are also being made.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before February 9, 2004, to be considered by this agency.

Connectionstraces to 3
6 references not yet in our index
  • 32 CFR 312
  • Pub. L. 96-354
  • Pub. L. 96-511
  • Pub. L. 104-4
  • Pub. L. 93-579
  • 88 Stat. 1896
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite32 CFR 312
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-354
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-511
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-4
Pub. L.Pub. L. 93-579
Cites 9 · showing 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.