Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-03 · Environmental Protection Agency · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final Notice of reissuance of a general permit

588 words·~3 min read·/register/2003/12/03/03-30046·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Action: Final Notice of reissuance of a general permit
Citation: FR Doc. 03-30046 · FRL-7593-1

Summary

On April 10, 2002, the general permit (GP) regulating activities related to the extraction of oil and gas on the North Slope of the Brooks Range in the state of Alaska expired. On May 24, 2003, EPA proposed to reissue this GP. There was a 45 day comment period. During the comment period, EPA received 5 comment letters on the GP. A Response to Comments was prepared for the GP. The Response to Comments also addresses comments made on the Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) coverage under this GP for the new source facility, BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.'s Badami. Upon submission of a new Notice of Intent (NOI), Badami will be reauthorized with the number AKG-33-0001. An NOI must be submitted before EPA will authorize coverage under this GP.

Dates

The GP will be effective January 2, 2004.

Supplementary Information

Executive Order 12866 The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from the review requirements of Executive Order 12866 pursuant to Section 6 of that order. The state of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), on November 19, 2003, has certified that the subject discharges comply with the applicable provisions of sections 208(e), 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The state of Alaska, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Office of Project Management and Permitting (OPMP), has conducted a review for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and on July 22, 2003, agreed with EPA's determination that the general permit is consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). Regulatory Flexibility Act Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. , a Federal agency must prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis “for any proposed rule” for which the agency “is required by section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), or any other law, to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking.” The RFA exempts from this requirement any rule that the issuing agency certifies “will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” EPA has concluded that NPDES general permits are permits, not rulemakings, under the APA and thus not subject to APA rulemaking requirements or the RFA. Notwithstanding that general permits are not subject to the RFA, EPA has determined that this GP, as issued, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Dated: November 20, 2003. Robert R. Robichaud, Acting Associate Director, Office of Water, Region 10, Environmental Protection Agency. [FR Doc. 03-30046 Filed 12-2-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final Notice of reissuance of a general permit
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.