Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-12-03 · FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

767 words·~3 min read·/register/2003/12/03/03-30003·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Public Information Collection(s) Requirement Submitted to OMB for Emergency Review and Approval November 24, 2003. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA)that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning
(a)whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before January 2, 2004. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Kim A. Johnson, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10236 NEOB, Washington, DC 20503,
(202)395-3562 or via Internet at *Kim_A._Johnson@omb.eop.gov,* and Les Smith, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-A804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 or via Internet to *Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies of the information collection(s) contact Les Smith at 202-418-0217 or via Internet at *Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has requested emergency OMB review of this collection with an approval by December 31, 2003. *OMB Control Number:* 3060-XXXX. *Title:* Digital Broadcast Content Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230. *Type of Review:* New collection. *Form Number:* N/A. *Respondents:* Business or other for-profit entities. *Number of Respondents:* 1,520. *Estimated Time per Response:* 2 to 40 hours. *Frequency of Response:* On occasion reporting requirements. *Total Annual Burden:* 3,800 hours. *Total Annual Cost:* None. *Needs and Uses:* On November 4, 2003, the FCC released the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“Order”), *In the Matter of Digital Broadcast Content Protection,* MB Docket No. 02-230, FCC 03-273. The Order establishes a redistribution control content protection system for digital broadcast television in order to prevent the widespread indiscriminate redistribution of high value digital broadcast content and to assure the continued availability of such content to broadcast outlets. The Order adopts use of an ATSC flag, which can be imbedded in DTV content to signal to consumer electronics devices to protect such content from indiscriminate redistribution. In order for this protection system to work, demodulators integrated within, or produced for use in, DTV reception devices, including PC and IT products, (“Covered Demodulator Products”) must recognize and give effect to the ATSC flag pursuant to certain compliance and robustness rules. In particular, content that is marked with the ATSC flag must be handled in a protected fashion through the use of digital content protection and recording technologies. In order to ensure that digital content is being adequately protected, such technologies must be reviewed and approved for use. The Order establishes interim procedures by which proponents of digital content protection and recording technologies can certify to the Commission that such technologies are appropriate for use in Covered Demodulator Products, subject to public notice and comment. To facilitate enforcement and compliance, the Order adopts a written commitment regime whereby manufacturers or importers of ATSC demodulators obtain from buyers of such products a written commitment that they will incorporate such demodulators into compliant and robust devices or sell or distribute to third parties that have also made such written commitment. The Order also adopts a written commitment regime to ensure that manufacturers or importers of Peripheral TSP Products (products where the demodulator and transport stream processor are physically separate) will abide by the Demodulator Products compliance and robustness rules. The interim approval process for digital content protection and recording technologies and the written commitment regime are essential components of the Commission's redistribution control content protection system for digital broadcast television. These information collections ensure objectivity and transparency as a part of this process. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 03-30003 Filed12-2-03; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.