Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-11-26 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Partial removal of direct final rule

500 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/11/26/03-29429·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Partial removal of direct final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-29429 · NC-106-20336(w); FRL-7588-6 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

Due to comments received, EPA is publishing a partial removal of the direct final approval of revisions to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) that was published on September 17, 2003 (68 FR 54362 ). EPA stated in the direct final rule that if EPA received comments by October 17, 2003, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect, or if comments were received on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule we may adopt as final those provisions of the rules that are not the subject of comments.

Dates

This rule is effective November 26, 2003.

Supplementary Information

On September 17, 2003 (68 FR 54406), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the North Carolina State Implementation Plan: Sections 2D.0105, 2D.0507, 2D.0509, 2D.0515, 2D.0516, 2D.0521, 2D.0912, 2D.0927, 2D.0932, 2D.0952, 2D.0954 and 2D.0959. On the same day (68 FR 54362), EPA also published a direct final rule approving these rules into the SIP, and providing a 30-day public comment period and explained that if we received comments, we would withdraw the relevant direct final action. We received comments, and are therefore removing the direct final approval of North Carolina's rule 2D.0952 “Petition for Alternative Controls For RACT” and 2D.0959 “Petition for Superior Alternative Controls”. We are not opening an additional comment period. At a later date, we intend to respond to comments and finalize action on this rule based on the September 17, 2003 proposal. The other rules listed above are not affected by this withdrawal and are incorporated into the SIP as of November 17, 2003. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: November 10, 2003. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. Chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows: PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II—North Carolina 2. In § 52.1770(c), table 1 is amended under subchapter 2D by revising entries for: “.0952” and “.0959” to read as follows: § 52.1770 Identification of plan. (c) * * * EPA Approved North Carolina Regulations State Citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date Explanation Subchapter 2D—Air Pollution Control Requirements Section .0900—Volatile Organic Compounds * * * * * * * Section .0952 Petition for Alternative Controls 05/01/95 02/01/96 62 FR 3589 * * * * * * * Section .0959 reserved * * * * * * * [FR Doc. 03-29429 Filed 11-25-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Partial removal of direct final rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.