Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-11-12 · Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice and request for public comments

500 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/11/12/03-28327·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT
Action: Notice and request for public comments
Citation: FR Doc. 03-28327 · Docket RSPA-98-4957

Summary

This notice requests public participation in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval process regarding an extension of an existing RSPA collection of information. RSPA intends to request OMB approval of information collection 2137-0596, National Pipeline Mapping Program under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 CFR part 1320.

Dates

Comments on this notice must be received within 60 days of the publication date of this notice to be assured of consideration.

Supplementary Information

Title: National Pipeline Mapping System Program. Type of Request: Extension of existing information collection. Abstract: The Department of Transportation (DOT), along with other Federal and State agencies, has been working side by side with natural gas and hazardous liquid operators to develop a national pipeline mapping system (NPMS). This system depicts and provides data on the entire United States natural gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipeline system operating in the United States. The Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 promulgated on December 17, 2002, requires that all transmission pipeline operators provide maps of their pipelines. Additionally, it requires updates when ownership or operation of these lines change. Estimate of Burden: 1 hour per mile. Respondents: Gas transmission and hazardous liquid operators. Estimated Number of Respondents: 900. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 157,112 hours. This document can be reviewed between 10 A.M.—5 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays, at the Dockets Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW, Washington, DC 20590. Comments are invited on: (a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques. All timely written comments to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also be available to the public in the docket. Issued in Washington, DC, on October 29, 2003. Stacey Gerard, Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. [FR Doc. 03-28327 Filed 11-10-03; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 5 CFR 1320
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice and request for public comments
Cite5 CFR 1320
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.