Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-10-22 · Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking

498 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/10/22/03-26546·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury
Action: Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking
Citation: FR Doc. 03-26546 · RIN 1545-AX39 · REG-110385-99 · 26 CFR 301

Summary

This document withdraws a portion of a notice of proposed rulemaking published on November 29, 1999, addressing certain transactions that occur within a specified period before or after a foreign entity changed its classification to disregarded-entity status.

Dates

Proposed § 301.7701-3(h) is withdrawn as of October 22, 2003.

Supplementary Information

Background On December 18, 1996, Treasury and IRS published in the Federal Register (61 FR 66584) final regulations (TD 8697) relating to the classification of business entities under section 7701 (check-the-box regulations). On November 29, 1999, Treasury and the IRS published in the Federal Register (64 FR 66591) a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-110385-99) proposing to amend §§ 301.7701-2 and 301.7701-3 of the current check-the-box regulations (proposed regulations). A public hearing on the proposed regulations was held on January 31, 2000. In addition, written comments were received. Most of the written and oral comments related to proposed § 301.7701-3(h), which provided a rule that would have operated to change the classification of a foreign disregarded entity if a so-called “extraordinary transaction” occurred one day before or within one year after the election to treat the entity as disregarded. In general, commentators criticized the approach adopted in this rule as overly broad and expressed concern that it would mitigate the increased certainty promoted by the check-the-box regulations in 1996. After considering the comments received, Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2003-46 (2003-28 IRB 53) on June 26, 2003, announcing the intention to withdraw the extraordinary transaction rule in proposed § 301.7701-3(h) and to finalize the remaining provisions of the proposed regulations addressing grandfathered entities and the relevancy of classification status. With the publication of this document, proposed § 301.7701-3(h) is withdrawn. Final regulations adopting without substantive change the portions of the proposed regulations relating to grandfathered entities and the relevancy of classification status are being published in the Rules and Regulations section elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register . These final regulations do not adopt the extraordinary transaction rule in proposed § 301.7701-3(h). Drafting Information The principal author of this withdrawal notice is Ronald M. Gootzeit, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other personnel from Treasury and the IRS participated in its development. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301 Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Partial Withdrawal of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, § 301.7701-3(h) of the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on November 29, 1999, (64 FR 66591) is withdrawn. Robert E. Wenzel, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. [FR Doc. 03-26546 Filed 10-21-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • 26 CFR 301
  • T.D. 8697
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite26 CFR 301
Treas. Dec.T.D. 8697
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.