Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-08-22 · Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS · Notices

Notices. Final notice

2,511 words·~11 min read·/register/2003/08/22/03-21440

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS-2136-FN] RIN 0938-AL79 Medicaid Program; State Allotments for Payment of Medicare Part B Premiums for Qualifying Individuals: Federal Fiscal Year 2002 AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Final notice. SUMMARY: In this notice, we are adopting as final the proposed expenditures allotted under sections 1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(I) and
(II)of the Social Security Act (the Act) to participating State agencies to pay all, or some portion of, Medicare Part B premium costs for a specified category of eligible low-income Medicare beneficiaries called qualifying individuals
(QIs)during Federal fiscal year 2002. The proposed notice announcing the update was published in the August 30, 2002 **Federal Register** . Federal fiscal year 2002 is the final year that these allotments are authorized under the Act. However, the Congress has extended funding at the same level for one group of QIs for fiscal year 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final notice is effective on October 21, 2003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Nakielny,
(410)786-4466. I. Background A. Before the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 Before enactment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), section 1902(a)(10)(E) of the Social Security Act specified that State Medicaid plans must provide Medicare cost-sharing for three groups of eligible low-income Medicare beneficiaries. These three groups include: qualified Medicare beneficiaries (QMBs), specified low-income Medicare beneficiaries (SLMBs), and qualified disabled and working individuals (QDWIs). A QMB is an individual entitled to Medicare Part A (Hospital Insurance) with an income that falls at or below the Federal poverty level and resources below $4,000 for an individual and $6,000 for a couple. An SLMB is an individual who meets the QMB criteria, except that his or her income is between a State-established level (at or below the Federal poverty level) and 120 percent of the Federal poverty level. A QDWI is an individual who is entitled to enroll in Medicare Part A, whose income does not exceed 200 percent of the Federal poverty level for a family of the size involved, whose resources do not exceed twice the amount allowed under the Supplementary Security Income program, and who is not otherwise eligible for Medicaid. The definition of Medicare cost-sharing at section 1905(p)(3) of the Act includes payment for Medicare premiums, although QDWIs only qualify to have Medicaid pay their Medicare Part A premiums, and SLMBs only qualify to have Medicaid pay their Medicare Part B premiums. B. After Enactment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 Section 4732 of the BBA amended section 1902(a)(10)(E) of the Act to require that States provide for Medicaid payment of all, or a portion of, Medicare Part B (Supplementary Medical Insurance) premiums, during the period beginning January 1998 through December 2002, for selected members of two eligibility groups of low-income Medicare beneficiaries, referred to as qualifying individuals (QIs). Under section 1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(I) of the Act, State agencies are required to pay the full amount of the Medicare Part B premium for selected QIs who would be QMBs except that their income level is at least 120 percent but less than 135 percent of the Federal poverty level for a family of the size involved. These individuals cannot otherwise be eligible for medical assistance under the approved State Medicaid plan. The second group of QIs, under section 1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(II) of the Act, includes Medicare beneficiaries who would be QMBs except that their income is at least 135 percent but less than 175 percent of the Federal poverty level for a family of the size involved. These QIs may not be otherwise eligible for Medicaid under the approved State plan, but are eligible for a portion of Medicare cost-sharing consisting only of a percentage of the increase in the Medicare Part B premium attributable to the shift of Medicare home health coverage from Part A to Part B (as provided in section 4611 of the BBA). Section 4732(c) of the BBA also added section 1933 of the Act, which specifies the provisions for State coverage of the Medicare cost-sharing for additional low-income Medicare beneficiaries. Section 1933(a) of the Act specifies that a State agency must provide, through a State plan amendment, for medical assistance to pay for the cost of Medicare cost-sharing on behalf of QIs who are selected to receive assistance. Section 1933(b) of the Act sets forth the rules that State agencies must follow in selecting QIs and providing payment for Medicare Part B premiums. Specifically, the State agency must permit all QIs to apply for assistance and must select individuals on a first-come, first-served basis in the order in which they apply. Section 1933(c) of the Act limits the total amount of Federal funds available for payment of Part B premiums each fiscal year and specifies the formula to be used to determine an allotment for each State from this total amount. For State agencies that execute a State plan amendment in accordance with section 1933(a) of the Act, a total of $1.5 billion was allocated over 5 years as follows: $200 million in FY 1998; $250 million in FY 1999; $300 million in FY 2000; $350 million in FY 2001; and $400 million in FY 2002. The Federal matching rate for Medicaid payment of Medicare Part B premiums for QIs is 100 percent for expenditures up to the amount of the State's allotment. No Federal matching funds are available for expenditures in excess of the State's allotment amount. Administrative expenses associated with the payment of Medicare Part B premiums for QIs remain at the 50 percent matching level and may not be taken from the State's allotment. The amount available for each fiscal year was allocated among States according to the formula set forth in section 1933(c)(2) of the Act. II. Provisions of the Proposed Notice The August 30, 2002 (67 FR 55851) proposed notice announced the proposed allotments that were made available to individual States for Federal fiscal year 2002 for the Medicaid payment of Medicare Part B premiums for QIs identified under sections 1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(I) and
(II)of the Act. Specifically, the Federal fiscal year 2002 allotments have been calculated as follows: A <sup>T</sup> = Total amount to be allocated M1 <sup>i</sup> = 3-year average of the number of Medicare beneficiaries in State i who are not enrolled in Medicaid and whose incomes are at least 120 percent but less than 135 percent of Federal poverty line M2 <sup>i</sup> = 3-year average of the number of Medicare beneficiaries in State i who are not enrolled in Medicaid and whose incomes are at least 135 percent but less than 175 percent of Federal poverty line. Then, the allotment reserved for State i is determined by the following formula: EN22AU03.000 We note that the formula used to calculate these allotments is the same we have used since 1998 for calculating the annual QI allotments. In applying the formula for the allotments presented in this document, we have used the latest data available to us as of August 30, 2002, the date we published our proposed allotments for Fiscal Year 2002. FY 2002 State Allotments for Payment of Part B Premiums Under Sec. 4732 of the BBA of 1997 State
(a)M1 1
(b)M2 2
(c)2 ×
(a)+
(b)State Share of
(c)State FY 2002 allocation ($000) AK 1 3 5 0.08% 321 AL 25 68 118 1.90 7,584 AR 23 46 92 1.48 5,913 AZ 20 63 103 1.65 6,620 CA 114 307 535 8.60 34,383 CO 11 37 59 0.95 3,792 CT 11 55 77 1.24 4,949 DC 3 5 11 0.18 707 DE 5 10 20 0.32 1,285 FL 114 249 477 7.66 30,656 GA 31 69 131 2.10 8,419 HI 3 13 19 0.31 1,221 IA 20 49 89 1.43 5,720 ID 7 18 32 0.51 2,057 IL 38 138 214 3.44 13,753 IN 46 88 180 2.89 11,568 KS 12 33 57 0.92 3,663 KY 19 65 103 1.65 6,620 LA 27 57 111 1.78 7,134 MA 40 85 165 2.65 10,604 MD 26 49 101 1.62 6,491 ME 7 23 37 0.59 2,378 MI 42 127 211 3.39 13,560 MN 27 46 100 1.61 6,427 MO 29 60 118 1.90 7,584 MS 17 44 78 1.25 5,013 MT 5 11 21 0.34 1,350 NC 49 89 187 3.00 12,018 ND 5 13 23 0.37 1,478 NE 9 34 52 0.84 3,342 NH 3 14 20 0.32 1,285 NJ 35 109 179 2.88 11,504 NM 11 28 50 0.80 3,213 NV 7 23 37 0.59 2,378 NY 92 233 417 6.70 26,799 OH 52 167 271 4.35 17,416 OK 14 65 93 1.49 5,977 OR 15 32 62 1.00 3,985 PA 81 187 349 5.61 22,429 RI 7 13 27 0.43 1,735 SC 34 58 126 2.02 8,098 SD 4 13 21 0.34 1,350 TN 37 61 135 2.17 8,676 TX 82 218 382 6.14 24,550 UT 7 16 30 0.48 1,928 VA 45 83 173 2.78 11,118 VT 3 8 14 0.22 900 WA 21 56 98 1.57 6,298 WI 24 87 135 2.17 8,676 WV 11 44 66 1.06 4,242 WY 3 7 13 0.21 835 Total 1374 3476 6224 100.00 $400,000 1 Three-year average (1999-2001) of number
(000)of Medicare beneficiaries in State who are not enrolled in Medicaid but whose incomes are at least 120% but less than 135% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). 2 Three-year average (1999-2001) of number
(000)of Medicare beneficiaries in State who are not enrolled in Medicaid but whose incomes are at least 135% but less than 175% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). III. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments and Provisions of the Final Notice We received no public comments on the August 30, 2002 **Federal Register** proposed notice. We are adopting the provisions of the proposed notice as final. IV. Regulatory Impact Statement We have examined the impacts of this final notice as required by Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory planning and review), the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA)(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354), section 1102(b) of the Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258, which merely reassigns responsibility of duties) directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis
(RIA)must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). We have determined this notice is not a major rule because we are simply giving notice of FY 2002 allotments that were available to States of up to $400 million for a specialized category of low-income Medicare beneficiaries. We note that these funds were already budgeted and expended. In fact, State expenditures claimed for fiscal year 2002 were less than 25 percent of the total amount allotted, which is below the $100 million threshold for economically significant rulemaking under Executive Order 12866. Therefore, consistent with Executive Order 12866, we are not providing an impact analysis. The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief for small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6 million to $29 million in any 1 year. Individuals and States are not included in the definition of a small entity. This final notice will allocate, among the States, Federal funds to provide Medicaid payment for Medicare Part B premiums for QIs. The total amount of Federal funds available during a Federal fiscal year and the formula for determining individual State allotments are specified in the law. Because the formula for determination of State allotments is specified in the statute, there were no other options to be considered. Therefore, we have applied the statutory formula for the State allotments except for the use of specified data. Because the data specified in the law were not available, we have used comparable data from the United States Census Bureau on the number of possible QIs in the States, as described in detail in the January 26, 1998 **Federal Register** . Since the statutory formula calls for an estimate of individuals who could qualify for QI status rather than the number of individuals who actually have that status, the exact numbers of those individuals will always be uncertain. These new allotments for FY 2002 incorporated the latest data from the United States Census Bureau from 1999 to 2001, as specified in the footnotes to the preceding table. We believe that announcing the final allocations in this notice will have a positive effect on States and individuals. Federal funding at the 100 percent matching rate was available for Medicare Part B premiums (or for a portion of those premiums) for QIs. In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds. Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditure in any 1 year by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or any the private sector, of $110 million. This final notice does not mandate expenditure by State, local or tribal governments in the aggregate or the private sector of $110 million. Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. Because this final notice provides notice of funding ceilings, as determined under the statute, we have determined that this final notice will not significantly affect the rights, roles, and responsibilities of States. We are not preparing analyses for either the RFA or section 1102(b) of the Act, because we have determined, and we certify, that this final notice will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities or a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this final notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program) Dated: April 18, 2003. Thomas A. Scully, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dated: May 13, 2003. Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary. [FR Doc. 03-21440 Filed 8-21-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 96-354
  • Pub. L. 104-4
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final notice
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-354
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-4
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.