Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-06-13 · Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Suspension of interim rule

474 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/06/13/03-14901·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration 21 CFR Part 1308 [DEA-236S] Schedules of Controlled Substances: Exempt Anabolic Steroid Products AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice. ACTION: Suspension of interim rule. SUMMARY: The DEA is suspending the order published January 15, 2003 designating two pharmaceutical preparations as exempt anabolic steroid products under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This suspension was brought about by the receipt of two comments that raised significant issues regarding the order. This action is part of the ongoing implementation of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act
(ASCA)of 1990. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 13, 2003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Sapienza, Chief, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC 20537, Telephone:
(202)307-7183. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The ASCA of 1990 (Title XIX of Pub. L. 101-647) placed anabolic steroids into Schedule III of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 812). Section 1903 of the ASCA provides that the Attorney General may exempt products which contain anabolic steroids from all or any part of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.* ) if the products have no significant potential for abuse. The authority to exempt these products was delegated from the Attorney General to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (28 CFR 0.1009b), who, in turn, redelegated this authority to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (28 CFR appendix to subpart R, Section 7, paragraph (g)). The procedure for implementing this section of the ASCA is found in § 1308.33 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In conformance with § 1308.33 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, an application was received from Syntho Pharmaceuticals to exempt two of their anabolic steroid products, Syntest H.S. and Syntest D.S. This application was forwarded to the Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS)for his evaluation. Upon the recommendation of HHS and other relevant information, the DEA published an interim rule and request for comments (68 FR 1964, January 15, 2003) in which the Deputy Assistant Administrator ordered the products to be added to the list of exempt anabolic steroids. Suspension of Order To Add Anabolic Steroid Products to the List of Products Exempted From Application of the CSA DEA received two comments from interested persons that raised significant issues regarding findings of fact or conclusions of law upon which this order was based. As set forth in 21 CFR 1308.33(d), the Deputy Assistant Administrator hereby immediately suspends the effectiveness of this order until she may reconsider the application in light of the comments and objections filed. Thereafter, the Deputy Assistant Administrator will reinstate, revoke, or amend her original order as she determines appropriate. Dated: June 4, 2003. Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control. [FR Doc. 03-14901 Filed 6-12-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 1308
  • Pub. L. 101-647
  • 28 CFR 0.1009
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Suspension of interim rule
Cite21 CFR 1308
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101-647
Cite28 CFR 0.1009
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.