Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-06-04 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

463 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/06/04/03-14038·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-822] Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Ninth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of the ninth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain helical spring lock washers from the People's Republic of China.
The period of review is October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 2003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Hastings or Geoffrey Craig, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement I, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202)482-3464 or
(202)482-5256, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The petitioner, Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works, and the respondent, Hang Zhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd., also known as Zhejiang Wanxin Group Co., Ltd., (Hangzhou), requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain helical spring lock washers for the period from October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002, on October 21, 2002 and October 31, 2002, respectively. Hangzhou also requested revocation of the order with respect to itself. The Department initiated the ninth antidumping duty administrative review of certain helical spring lock washers from the People's Republic of China, covering the period from October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002, and on the request for revocation of the antidumping duty order in part on November 22, 2002. *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part* , 67 FR 70402 (November 22, 2002). The preliminary results are currently due on July 3, 2002. Statutory Time Limits Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary results within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the order for which a review is requested. However, if it is not practicable to issue the preliminary results within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend this deadline to a maximum of 365 days. We are currently developing factor value information. In addition, we plan to verify Hangzhou's response, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.307(b)(1)(iii). Accordingly, the Department has determined that it is not practicable to issue the preliminary results within the 245-day time period. Therefore, we are extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results of this administrative review for 120 days, until no later than October 31, 2003. This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 29, 2003. Jeffrey May, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 03-14038 Filed 6-3-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.