Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-04-29 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of adequacy determination

480 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/04/29/03-10549·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Notice of adequacy determination
Citation: FR Doc. 03-10549 · CA089-NOT; FRL-7489-2

Summary

In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets contained in the submitted San Diego County, California serious 1-hour ozone nonattainment area redesignation request and maintemance plan are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. As a result of our finding, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Authority must use the VOC and NO X motor vehicle emissions budgets from the submitted plan for future conformity determinations.

Dates

This determination is effective May 14, 2003.

Supplementary Information

Background This notice announces our finding that the emissions budgets contained in the Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for San Diego County , submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on December 20, 2002, are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. EPA Region IX made this finding in a letter to CARB on April 9, 2003. We are also announcing this finding on our conformity Web site: . Once there, go to “Transportation Conformity,” then select “Adequacy Web Pages.” Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. Our conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). One of these criteria is that the plan provide for maintenance of the relevant ambient air quality standard. We have preliminarily determined that the San Diego County 1-hour ozone maintenance plan does provide for maintenance of the 1-hour ozone standards and, therefore, can be found adequate. We have described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in guidance (May 14, 1999 memo titled “Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision”). We followed this guidance in making our adequacy determination on the emissions budgets contained in the San Diego County 1-hour ozone maintenance plan. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671 q. Dated: April 21, 2003. Alexis Strauss, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 03-10549 Filed 4-28-03; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)
  • 42 USC 7401-7671
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of adequacy determination
Cite40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)
Cite42 USC 7401-7671
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.