Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-03-06 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule

504 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/03/06/03-5308·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-5308 · RI-1047b; FRL-7458-6 · 40 CFR 62

Summary

EPA proposes to approve the sections 111(d) negative declaration submitted by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) on May 27, 1998. This negative declaration adequately certifies that there are no existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills located in the state of Rhode Island that have accepted waste since November 8, 1987 and that must install collection and control systems according to EPA's emissions guidelines for existing MSW landfills.

Dates

EPA must receive comments in writing by April 7, 2003.

Supplementary Information

Under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA published regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B which require states to submit control plans to control emissions of designated pollutants from designated facilities. In the event that a state does not have a particular designated facility located within its boundaries, EPA requires that the state submit a negative declaration in lieu of a control plan. The Rhode Island DEM submitted the negative declaration to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register , EPA is approving the Rhode Island negative declaration as a direct final rule without a prior proposal. EPA is doing this because the Agency views this action as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates that it will not receive any significant, material, and adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If EPA does not receive any significant, material, and adverse comments to this action, then the approval will become final without further proceedings. If EPA receives adverse comments, we will withdraw the direct final rule and EPA will address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not begin a second comment period. Dated: February 20, 2003. Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 03-5308 Filed 3-5-03; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 62
  • 40 CFR 60
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 62
Cite40 CFR 60
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.