Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-31 · Department of Justice · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Final rule

609 words·~3 min read·/register/2003/01/31/03-2252·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Department of Justice
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-2252 · AAG/A Order No. 005-2003 · 28 CFR 16

Summary

The Department of Justice, Office of the Pardon Attorney (OPA), is exempting a Privacy Act system of records entitled “Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001)” from subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (e)(5) of the Privacy Act. Information in this system relates to the investigation and evaluation of applicants for executive clemency and case-related correspondence regarding such applicants and the clemency process. The exemptions are necessary to avoid interference with clemency investigations and decision-making, when such interference could impair the Department of Justice's ability to provide candid recommendations to the President for his ultimate decisions on clemency matters, and to prevent unwarranted invasions of the personal privacy of third parties. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective January 31, 2003.

Supplementary Information

On October 31, 2002 (67 FR 66348), a proposed rule was published in the Federal Register with an invitation to comment. No comments were received. This order relates to individuals rather than small business entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order will not have “a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.” List of Subjects in Part 16 Administrative practices and procedures, Courts, Freedom of Information and Privacy. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a, and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, 28 CFR Part 16 is amended as follows: PART 16—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 16 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701. 2. Section 16.79 is revised to read as follows: § 16.79 Exemption of Pardon Attorney System. (a) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a, subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (e)(5): Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001). These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in this system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). (b) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons: (1) From subsection (c)(3) because: (i) The purpose of the creation and maintenance of the Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001) is to enable the Justice Department to prepare reports and recommendations to the President for his ultimate decisions on clemency matters, which are committed to exclusive discretion of the President pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution. (ii) Release of the disclosure accounting, for disclosures pursuant to the routine uses published for this system, would permit the requester to obtain valuable information concerning the nature and scope of a clemency investigation, invade the right of candid and confidential communications among officials concerned with making recommendations to the President in clemency matters, and disclose the identity of persons who furnished information to the Government under an express or implied promise that their identities would be held in confidence. (2) From subsection (c)(4) because the exemption from subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) will make notification of disputes inapplicable. (3) From subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (4) From subsection (e)(5) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Dated: January 17, 2003. Paul R. Corts, Assistant Attorney General for Administration. [FR Doc. 03-2252 Filed 1-30-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4
3 references not yet in our index
  • 28 CFR 16
  • 5 USC 601-612
  • 18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Final rule
Cite28 CFR 16
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cite18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.