Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-27 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

492 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/01/27/03-1705·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-47212; File No. SR-ISE-2002-27] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the International Securities Exchange, Inc., Relating to the Repeal of Limitations on Orders January 17, 2003. On November 21, 2002, the International Securities Exchange, Inc. (“ISE” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change relating to the repeal of limitations on orders.
Notice of the proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on December 16, 2002. 3 No comments were received on the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46959 (December 6, 2002), 67 FR 77115. The Exchange proposes to repeal the provision in its Rule 717 that prohibits Electronic Access Members (“EAMs”) from sending in more than one order every 15 seconds for the same beneficial owner in options on the same underlying security.
The ISE adopted this “speed bump” in 2000 to protect ISE market makers from exposure across multiple series of options if they receive orders in many series at the same time. 4 The Exchange now represents that the rule has been outmoded by the development of sophisticated risk management tools and that eliminating this restriction will provide EAMs and their customers with enhanced access to the ISE. 4 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44017 (February 28, 2001), 66 FR 13820 (March 7, 2001).
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 5 Elimination of the “speed bump” will remove an impediment to trading created only to limit the market risk undertaken by ISE market makers. Additionally, the change should permit faster entry and execution of orders on the Exchange, thereby providing investors with improved services. Therefore, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 6 which requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market, and to protect investors and the public interest. 5 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78(c)(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 7 that the proposed rule change (File No.
SR-ISE-2002-27) be, and it hereby is, approved. 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 8 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 03-1705 Filed 1-24-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
  • 15 USC 78(c)(f)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cite15 USC 78(c)(f)
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.