Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-27 · Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

515 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/01/27/03-1670·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-1670 · AAG/A Order No. 004-2003 · 28 CFR 16

Summary

The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act system of records entitled “Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System (CLSS), Justice/DEA-002,” from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4); (e)(1), (2) and (3), (e)(5) and (e)(8); and (g) of the Privacy Act of 1974.

Dates

Submit any comments by February 26, 2003.

Supplementary Information

The exemptions will be applied only to the extent that information in a record is subject to an exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k). This order relates to individuals rather than small business entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, this order will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16 Administrative practices and procedures, Courts, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, 28 CFR part 16 is amended as follows: PART 16—[AMENDED] Subpart E—Exemption of Records Systems under the Privacy Act 1. The authority for part 16 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552(a), 552b(g), and 553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510 and 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 9701. 2. Section 16.98 is amended as follows: (a) By revising paragraph (c) (b) By revising the first sentence of paragraph (d) (c) By removing paragraphs (g) and (h) The revisions read as follows: § 16.98 Exemption of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)—limited access. (c) Systems of records identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(7) below are exempted pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2) from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4); (e)(1), (2) and (3), (e)(5), (e)(8); and (g) of 5 U.S.C. 552a. In addition, systems of records identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) below are also exempted pursuant to the provisions of 552a(k)(1) from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4); and (e)(1): (1) Air Intelligence Program (Justice/DEA-001) (2) Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System (Justice/DEA-002) (3) Investigative Reporting and Filing System (Justice/DEA-008) (4) Planning and Inspection Division Records (Justice/DEA-010) (5) Operation Files (Justice/DEA-011) (6) Security Files (Justice/DEA-013) (7) System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (Stride/Ballistics) (Justice/DEA-014) (d) Exemptions apply to the following systems of records only to the extent that information in the systems is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), and (k)(2): Air Intelligence Program (Justice/DEA-001); Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System (CLSS) (Justice/DEA-002); Planning and Inspection Division Records (Justice/DEA-010); and Security Files (Justice/DEA-013). * * * Dated: January 17, 2003. Paul R. Corts, Assistant Attorney General for Administration. [FR Doc. 03-1670 Filed 1-24-03; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4
3 references not yet in our index
  • 28 CFR 16
  • 5 USC 601-612
  • 18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite28 CFR 16
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cite18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.