Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-23 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. Notice

730 words·~3 min read·/register/2003/01/23/03-1521

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-18-M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Proposed Collection; Comment Request ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)).
This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements can be properly assessed. Currently, Departmental Management is soliciting comments concerning the proposed extension of the *Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Conference Evaluations Generic Clearance.* A copy of the proposed information collection request
(ICR)can be obtained by contacting the individual listed below in the addresses section of this notice. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addresses section below on or before March 24, 2003. The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Darrin A. King, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Mr. King can be reached on 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll free number) or by e-mail at *king-darrin@dol.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Background The Department of Labor
(DOL)conducts a variety of voluntary Customer Satisfaction Surveys of regulated/non-regulated entities, which are specifically designed to gather information from a customer's perspective as prescribed by E.O. 12862, Setting Customer Service Standards, September 11, 1993. These Customer Satisfaction Surveys provide information on customer attitudes about the delivery and quality of agency products/services and are used as part of an ongoing process to improve DOL programs. This generic clearance allows agencies to gather information from both Federal and non-Federal users. In addition to conducting Customer Satisfaction Surveys, the Department also includes the use of evaluation forms for those DOL agencies conducting conferences. These evaluations are helpful in determining the success of the current conference, in developing future conferences, and in meeting the needs of the Department's product/service users. II. Current Actions Over the past three years the DOL has conducted more than two dozen Customer Satisfaction Surveys and conference evaluations, which have helped assess the Departments products and services and has led to improvements in areas deemed necessary. Office of Management and Budget approval for this collection of information expires June 30, 2003. DOL proposes to seek continued approval for this collection of information for an additional three years. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Agency:* Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Departmental Management. *Title:* Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Conference Evaluations Generic Clearance. *OMB Number:* 1225-0059. *Affected Public:* Individuals and households; business or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; farms; Federal Government; and State, Local, or Tribal Government. *Total Respondents:* Varies by survey/evaluation; may range from as few as 10 to over 63,750. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Total Responses:* Varies by survey/evaluation; may range from as few as 10 to over 63,750. *Average Time Per Response:* Varies by survey/evaluation with an average of 9.5 minutes per survey and 2.5 minutes per evaluation. *Total Burden Hours:* 13,500. *Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):* $0. *Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance):* $0. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they also will become a matter of public record. Signed at Washington, DC., this 17th day of January, 2003. Darrin A. King, Agency Clearance Officer, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management. [FR Doc. 03-1521 Filed 1-22-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.