Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-16 · Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule

591 words·~3 min read·/register/2003/01/16/03-961·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 03-961 · OH155-1b; FRL-7425-7 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

The USEPA is proposing to approve, through direct final procedure, oxides of nitrogen (NO X ) rules including an allowance trading program submitted by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA). The implementation plan affects electric generating units (EGUs), non-EGUs and portland cement plants, and was submitted in a letter from the Ohio EPA Director on July 11, 2002, following required public process. The intent of Ohio's action is to satisfy a Federal requirement to develop a plan to control emissions from these categories of sources in order to meet the emissions budget established by USEPA for Ohio during the summer-time ozone control period. USEPA is approving this plan with the understanding that Ohio will make the minor revision to the date in Ohio's rule by which flow control will be triggered. Flow control affects all States in the trading program, and the date by which it is triggered, 2005, must be consistent for all 19 States. In the final rules section of this Federal Register , USEPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for NO X as a direct final rule without prior proposal because we view this action as noncontroversial and anticipate no adverse comments. If no written adverse comments are received in response to the direct final rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If USEPA receives meaningful written adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. If no adverse written comments are received, the direct final rule will take effect on the date stated in that document and no further activity will be taken on this proposed rule. Any party interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

Dates

Comments on this action must be received by February 18, 2003.

Supplementary Information

Throughout this document whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” are used we mean the USEPA. I. What Actions Are USEPA Taking Today? II. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and Corresponding Direct Final Rule? I. What Actions Are USEPA Taking Today? The USEPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Ohio SIP submitted by the State which demonstrates the Ohio EPA plan will enable affected sources in the State to reduce emissions of NO X in order for the State to meet the NO X emissions budget. USEPA is making the approval with the understanding that Ohio will change the year that flow control will be triggered to 2005, from 2006 currently in Ohio's rule. II. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information see the direct final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register . Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4201-7601q. Dated: December 13, 2002. Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 03-961 Filed 1-15-03; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
  • 42 USC 4201-7601q
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cite42 USC 4201-7601q
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.