Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-01-14 · U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury · Notices

Notices. Final rule; technical correction

462 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/01/14/03-741·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-33-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Customs Service 19 CFR Part 4 [T.D. 02-62] RIN 1515-AD11 Presentation of Vessel Cargo Declaration to Customs Before Cargo Is Laden Aboard Vessel at Foreign Port for Transport to the United States; Technical Correction AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final rule; technical correction. SUMMARY: This document contains a technical correction to the final regulations (T.D. 02-62), which were published Thursday, October 31, 2002.
The regulations required the advance and accurate presentation of certain vessel cargo declaration information to Customs prior to lading the cargo aboard the vessel at the foreign port and encouraged the presentation of this information electronically. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Nott, Office of Field Operations, (202-927-0042). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 31, 2002, Customs published a final rule document in the **Federal Register** (67 FR 66318) as T.D. 02-62.
The final rule concerned the requirement to provide advance and accurate presentation to Customs of certain vessel cargo declaration information prior to lading the cargo aboard the vessel at the foreign port and encouraged the presentation of this information electronically. This correction concerns when a transmission of the required cargo declaration information must be made by an eligible non-vessel operating common carrier (NVOCC). Specifically, in T.D. 02-62, § 4.7(b)(2) of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 4.7(b)(2)) correctly provided that Customs must receive from the vessel carrier the vessel's Cargo Declaration, Customs Form 1302, or a Customs-approved electronic equivalent, 24 hours before such cargo was laden aboard the vessel at the foreign port.
By contrast, § 4.7(b)(3)(i) inadvertently stated in effect that if an eligible NVOCC elected to file such cargo declaration information with Customs, the NVOCC would have to electronically transmit this information to Customs 24 hours before the related cargo was laden aboard the vessel at the foreign port. However, under T.D. 02-62, both vessel carriers and NVOCCs were properly intended to be subject to the same 24-hour advance presentation requirement. As such, it was intended that under § 4.7(b)(3)(i) Customs likewise receive from a participating NVOCC the necessary cargo declaration information 24 hours before the related cargo was laden aboard the vessel at the foreign port.
This document corrects that unintended inconsistency. Correction of Publication Accordingly, the publication on October 31, 2002 of the final regulations (T.D. 02-62), which were the subject of FR Doc. 02-27661, is corrected as follows: On page 66331, in the second column, in § 4.7, in the first sentence of paragraph (b)(3)(i), on line 14, add between the words “Vessel Automated Manifest System (AMS)” and “24 or more hours” the words “that must be received'. Dated: January 9, 2003.
Michael T. Schmitz, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Regulations and Rulings. [FR Doc. 03-741 Filed 1-13-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 4
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final rule; technical correction
Cite19 CFR 4
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.