Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-12-24 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice and request for comment

468 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/12/24/02-32307·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA
Action: Notice and request for comment
Citation: 67 FR (No. 247) · FR Doc. 02-32307 · Doc. No. LS-02-17

Summary

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), this notice announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) intention to request from the Office of Management and Budget approval for an extension of and revision to a currently approved information collection “Customer Service Survey (Meat Grading and Certification Services).”

Dates

Comments must be received on or before February 24, 2003.

Supplementary Information

Title: Customer Service Survey (Meat Grading and Certification Services). OMB Number: 0581-0193. Expiration Date of Approval: June 30, 2003. Type of Request: Extension and revision of a currently approved information collection. Abstract: The customer service survey is being conducted to evaluate how well we are meeting our customer's expectations. The information obtained will be used to manage the program in providing cost effective, quality services expected by our customers. Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.0830 hours per response. Respondents: Producers and owners of meat establishments. Estimated Number of Respondents: 450 respondents. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 37.35 hours. Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.