Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-11-22 · DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

466 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/11/22/02-29749·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RP03-77-000] Reliant Energy Services, Inc., Complainant, v. Florida Gas Transmission Company, Respondent; Notice of Complaint and Request for Fast Track Processing November 18, 2002. Take notice that on November 15, 2002, Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
(RES)filed a Complaint and Request for Fast Track Processing against Florida Gas Transmission Company
(FGT)requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) find that FGT is in violation of its tariff by demanding a letter of credit far in excess of that permitted by the creditworthiness provisions of FGT's tariff and excluding, on an unduly discriminatory basis in violation of sections 5 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), RES from an expansion project unless RES posts a letter of credit far in excess of that permitted by the creditworthiness provisions of FGT's tariff. RES also contends that FGT has indicated an intention to build an expansion project that is inconsistent with its certificate authorization. RES requests that the Commission issue an order finding and declaring that FGT's notification to RES that FGT intends to terminate its contractual obligation to provide firm transportation service to RES through use of the Phase VI facilities is unduly discriminatory, in violation of FGT's tariff, the Commission's certificate issued to FGT for its phase VI Facilities expansion in Docket No. CP02-27-000, and the NGA. A copy of the filing was served upon the Respondent. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. The answer to the complaint and all comments, interventions or protests must be filed on or before November 25, 2002. This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at *http://www.ferc.gov* using the “FERRIS” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov* or toll-free at
(866)208-3676, or for TTY, contact
(202)502-8659. The answer to the complaint, comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; *see* 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. Linwood A. Watson, Jr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-29749 Filed 11-21-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.