Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-10-31 · NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of decision of NAFTA Panel

442 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/10/31/02-27707·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews: Decision of the Panel AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of decision of NAFTA Panel. SUMMARY: On October 15, 2002 the NAFTA Panel issued its decision in the matter of Pure Magnesium from Canada, Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-00-1904-06. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230,
(202)482-5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade Agreement (“Agreement”) establishes a mechanism to replace domestic judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national courts to review expeditiously the final determinations to determine whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination. Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada and the Government of Mexico established *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews* (“Rules”). These Rules are published in the **Federal Register** on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). The panel review in this matter was conducted in accordance with these Rules. *Background Information:* On August 4, 2000, the Government of Quebec filed a First Request for Panel Review with the U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Panel review was requested of the Final Results of the Full Sunset Review made by the International Trade Administration respecting Pure Magnesium from Canada. This determination was published in the **Federal Register** on July 5, 2000 (65 FR 41,436). The request was assigned File No. USA-CDA-00-1904-06. *Panel Decision:* The Panel remanded this matter back to the Department
(i)for further consideration of the record concerning the “other factors” which are required to be taken into account pursuant to our conclusion in Sections 2 and 3 of this opinion;
(ii)to reconsider whether the normal preference for the investigation rate should not be followed here. The Panel ordered the Department to issue a determination on remand consistent with the instructions set forth in the Panel's decision. The determination on remand shall be issued within sixty
(60)days of the date of the Order (not later than December 16, 2002). Dated: October 17, 2002. Caratina L. Alston, U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 02-27707 Filed 10-30-02; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.