Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-09-27 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

363 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/09/27/02-24504

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-23-M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-40,188 and NAFTA-05386] GFC Foam, LLC, West Hazelton, PA; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On June 17, 2002, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice will soon be published in the **Federal Register** . The Department initially denied TAA to workers of GFC Foam, LLC, West Hazelton, Pennsylvania because criterion
(3)was not met. The “contributed importantly” group eligibility requirement of section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met. Imports did not contribute importantly to the worker separations. The Department denied NAFTA-TAA because criteria
(3)and
(4)have not been met. Imports from Canada or Mexico did not contribute importantly to workers' separations. There was no shift in production from the subject firm to Canada or Mexico during the relevant period. The workers at the subject firm were engaged in employment related to the production of polyurethane foam. The petitioner believes customers were importing polyurethane foam and therefore requested that the Department of Labor survey customers of the subject firm. On review of the request for reconsideration the Department of Labor determined that a survey of major customers should be conducted for the relevant period. On reconsideration, the Department contacted the company for a list of major declining customers of the subject firm. The company supplied a list of major customers of the subject firm. The U.S. Department of Labor conducted a survey of the major customers of the subject firm regarding their purchases of polyurethane foam during 1999, 2000 and January through September 2001. The survey revealed that none of the customers reported importing polyurethane foam from Canada or Mexico or from any other foreign source during the relevant period. Conclusion After reconsideration, I affirm the original notices of negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance and NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance for workers and former workers of GFC Foam, LLC, West Hazelton, Pennsylvania. Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of September 2002. Edward A. Tomchick, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 02-24504 Filed 9-26-02; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.