Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-09-17 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

572 words·~3 min read·/register/2002/09/17/02-23532

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-46480; File No. SR-BSE-2002-07] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Competing Specialists and Objections to Competing Specialist Competition September 10, 2002. I. Introduction On June 25, 2002, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (“BSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change related to competing specialists and objections to competing specialist competition.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on July 30, 2002. 3 No comments were received on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46238 (July 19, 2002), 67 FR 49378. II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange proposes to amend the section of the Exchange's Competing Specialist Initiative (“CSI”) procedures relating to objections to competition filed by a regular specialist.
The Exchange is seeking to implement a procedure that would permit competition pending a final review of any objection to competition filed by a regular specialist. Under current CSI procedures set forth in Chapter XV, *Dealer Specialists,* Section 18, *Procedures for Competing Specialists,* any objection to competition by a regular specialist will prevent a competing specialist from trading, and competing with the regular specialist, in the security at issue, until the objection is adjudicated by the Exchange's Market Performance Committee (“MPC”).
In order to streamline this process, the Exchange is proposing that a majority of the floor members of the MPC be able to vote to permit competition in a security pending the formalization of a regular specialist's objection and the subsequent convening of a full meeting of the MPC to review the objection. III. Discussion The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section 6(b) of the Act, 4 in general, and section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 5 in particular, which requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. 6 4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 6 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
The Commission believes that the proposal should enhance competition to the ultimate benefit of investors, while still offering the regular specialist the opportunity to formalize an objection, and have that objection fully considered. Moreover, the Commission believes that the proposal should prevent a disingenuous regular specialist from abusing the competition objection process by objecting to specialist competition solely as leverage for objections unrelated to specialist competition.
IV. Conclusion *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 7 that the proposed rule change (SR-BSE-2002-07) is hereby approved. 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 8 17 CFR 200.30-2(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-23532 Filed 9-16-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.