Notices. Proposed rule
353 words·~2 min read·
/register/2002/08/22/02-21436·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [CA 264-0355b; FRL-7258-4] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (MBUAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the emission of volatile organic compounds
(VOC)from steam drive crude oil production wells. DATE: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by September 23, 2002. ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. You can inspect a copy of the submitted rule revision and EPA's technical support document
(TSD)at our Region IX office during normal business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted rule revision and TSD at the following locations: Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20460. California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 1001 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, 24580 Silver Cloud Court, Monterey, CA 93940. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX;
(415)947-4118. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the approval of the local MBUAPCD Rule 427. In the Rules and Regulations section of this **Federal Register** , we are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action. Dated: July 16, 2002. Keith Takata, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 02-21436 Filed 8-21-02; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
- 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources