Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-07-30 · Department of Defense (DoD) · Notices

Notices. Final rule

435 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/07/30/02-19080

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 225 [DFARS Case 2002-D011] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Trade Agreements Thresholds—Construction AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). The rule implements the determination of the U.S. Trade Representative to revise the dollar thresholds for application of the Trade Agreements Act and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to construction contracts.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 30, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD (AT&L) DP (DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-0328; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2002-D011. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background On March 27, 2002 (67 FR 14763), the U.S. Trade Representative published a determination that decreased the threshold for application of the Trade Agreements Act to construction contracts from $6,806,000 to $6,481,000; and increased the threshold for application of NAFTA to construction contracts from $7,068,419 to $7,304,733. This final rule amends the prescriptions for use of the clauses at DFARS 252.225-7044, Balance of Payments Program—Construction Material, and 252.225-7045, Balance of Payments Program—Construction Material Under Trade Agreements, to reflect the new dollar thresholds. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act This rule will not have a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors, or a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD. Therefore, publication for public comment is not required. However, DoD will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2002-D011. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council. Therefore, 48 CFR Part 225 is amended as follows: 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 225 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1. PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 225.7503 [Amended] 2. Section 225.7503 is amended as follows: a. In paragraph (a), and in paragraph
(b)in the first and last sentences, by removing “$6,806,000” and adding in its place “$6,481,000”; and b. In paragraph (b), in the last sentence, by removing “$7,068,419” and adding in its place “$7,304,733”. [FR Doc. 02-19080 Filed 7-29-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 225
  • 41 USC 421
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 225
Cite41 USC 421
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.