Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-07-03 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

636 words·~3 min read·/register/2002/07/03/02-16690·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-46119; File No. SR-CBOE-2002-16] Self Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Relating to the Removal of the Restriction on Floor Brokers From Trading in the Same Crowds as Affiliated Designated Primary Market-Makers June 25, 2002. On April 18, 2002, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to delete existing CBOE Rule 8.91(d) that prohibits a member affiliated with a Designated Primary Market-Maker (“DPM”) from acting as a floor broker in any trading crowd in which that DPM is the appointed DPM. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 1 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on May 17, 2002. 3 The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45909 (May 10, 2002), 67 FR 35165. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6 of the Act 4 and the rules and regulations thereunder. 5 Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 6 which, among other things, requires that the CBOE's rules be designed to facilitate transactions in securities, and remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
According to the CBOE, its Rule 8.91(d) was originally intended to prevent DPMs from circumventing their affirmative obligations, such as placing eligible public orders in the book, according priority to any order which the DPM acts as agent over the DPM's principal transactions, not charging any brokerage commission for the execution of orders for which the DPM acts as both agent and principal and not representing discretionary orders. The CBOE represented that its current rules will continue to prohibit DPMs from circumventing their obligations. 7 Therefore, the Commission believes that the regulatory concerns that CBOE Rule 8.91(d) was intended to address will continue to be prevented.
The Commission expects the CBOE to surveil its DPMs and affiliated floor brokers to ensure that they are not using their affiliations to circumvent CBOE rules. 4 15 U.S.C. 78f. 5 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 7 For example, according to the CBOE, its Rule 6.43, Manner of Bidding and Offering, prohibits a DPM from directing its trades to particular members.
Also, according to the CBOE, its Rule 7.4, Obligations for Orders, requires a DPM to “use due diligence to execute the orders placed in his custody at the best prices available to him under the Rules of the Exchange.” Finally, the CBOE represented that its Rule 4.1, Just and Equitable Principles of Trade, provides a general protection from any illicit intentions by stating that: “No member shall engage in acts or practices inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade.
Persons associated with members shall have the same duties and obligations as members under the Rules of this Chapter [IV].” *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CBOE-2002-16) be, and it hereby is, approved. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 9 9 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-16690 Filed 7-2-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.