Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-07-01 · International Trade Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

493 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/07/01/02-16475·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: International Trade Commission
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 02-16475 · Inv. No. 337-TA-459

Summary

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 18) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) terminating the above-captioned investigation as to respondents Lynx Industries, Inc., Napoleon Spring Works, Inc., and Guardian Access Corp. on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. Since these three respondents are the only respondents remaining in the investigation, their termination terminates the investigation.

Supplementary Information

The Commission instituted this investigation on July 19, 2001, based on a complaint filed by the Chamberlain Group, Inc. of Elmhurst, Illinois (“Chamberlain”) against six respondents, 66 FR 37704 (July 19, 2001). Two respondents and an intervenor were subsequently added to the investigation. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain garage door operators including components thereof by reason of infringement of claims 1-8 of U.S. Letters Patent Re. 35,364 and claims 5-30 of U.S. Letters Patent Re. 36,703. On February 6, 2002, complainant Chamberlain filed a motion to terminate the investigation as to respondents Lynx Industries, Inc., Napoleon Spring Works, Inc., and Guardian Access Corp. on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. The Commission investigative attorney supported the joint motion and the three respondents opposed it. On June 5, 2002, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 18) granting the motion. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 25, 2002. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 02-16475 Filed 6-28-02; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.