Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-06-11 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of a draft for public review and comment

620 words·~3 min read·/register/2002/06/11/02-14632·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Notice of a draft for public review and comment
Citation: FR Doc. 02-14632 · FRL -7229-3

Summary

This notice announces the availability of the External Review Draft of a document, Draft Action Plan for the Development of a Framework for Metals Assessment and Guidance for Characterizing and Ranking Metals, EPA/630/P-02/003A, prepared by a cross-agency workgroup under the auspices of the Science Policy Council. This External Review Draft of the Project Work Plan will be reviewed by the EPA's Science Advisory Board in an advisory capacity. The EPA also is announcing a public comment period for the draft document. EPA will consider the SAB's advice and public comment submissions in revising the Draft Action Plan. The plan may be modified and amended from time to time, as necessary, to reflect actual project requirements and progress. Information on the date and location of the SAB public review meeting (anticipated mid-summer 2002) will be published in a future Federal Register notice.

Dates

Comments may be submitted through the day of the SAB Advisory meeting, however in order for the Agency to consider comments in the development of the final charge to the SAB, comments should be received no later than July 2, 2002.

Supplementary Information

Many EPA programs are faced with deciding whether and how to regulate toxic metals. These decisions range from setting regulatory standards for environmental releases, to establishing safe levels in different environmental media, to setting priorities for regulatory or voluntary efforts. A basic input to the decision-making process for most EPA programs is an assessment of the potential hazards and risks posed by the metal(s) to human health and the environment. Hazard and risk assessments of metals and metal compounds raise issues not generally encountered with organic chemicals. In recognition of the unique assessment issues raised by metals and the complexity of addressing these issues consistently across the Agency's various programs, the Agency's Science Policy Council tasked an Agency work group to devise an Action Plan. The goal of this Action Plan is to establish a process for developing guidance that will assure (1) a consistent application of scientific principles for assessing hazard and risk for metals, (2) state-of-the-science application of methods and data, (3) A transparent process ( i.e. articulating assumptions and uncertainties), and (4) the flexibility to address program-specific issues. The Action Plan includes brief descriptions of the Agency's metals assessment activities, and identifies critical assessment issues that need to be addressed by the cross-agency guidance. Dated: June 5, 2002. George W. Alapas, Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment. [FR Doc. 02-14632 Filed 6-10-02; 8:45 am]

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.