Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-06-10 · FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

422 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/06/10/02-14411

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION [Docket No. 02-08] Odyssey Stevedoring of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Port Authority; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (“Commission”) by Odyssey Stevedoring of Puerto Rico, Inc. (“Complainant”) against the Puerto Rico Port Authority (“PRPA”). Complainant contends that PRPA engaged in a number of activities in connection with negotiating and entering into maritime terminal leases and agreements, including preferential use, berthing and warehousing agreements, which violated sections 10(d)(1), 10(d)(2), and 10(d)(4) of the Shipping Act of 1984 and injured the Complainant.
Complainant asks that PRPA be compelled to answer its charges and that the Commission order PRPA to: Cease and desist from these violations; re-apportion certain terminal facilities located at the Port of San Juan between the remaining stevedoring and marine terminal companies, including Complainant; and take such further and other actions as to afford preferential usage, including berthing, warehousing and open spaces, as the Commission establishes as necessary to restore competition in regard to stevedoring and breakbulk services in the Port of San Juan.
The Complainant also requests the Commission to award it damages in an amount reflecting Complainant's lost business and profits; the amounts which Complainant has paid pursuant to PRPA's tariff which exceed the amounts Complainant would have paid pursuant to certain PRPA preferential use and exclusive use agreements, and such other further relief as the Commission determines just and proper in the circumstances. This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative Law Judges.
Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record.
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by June 3, 2003, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 1, 2003. Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-14411 Filed 6-7-02; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 46 CFR 502.61
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Cite46 CFR 502.61
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.