Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 02-13115 · FRL-7217-3 · 40 CFR 268

Summary

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is today proposing to grant a site-specific treatment variance from the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards for two selenium-bearing hazardous wastes. EPA is proposing to grant this variance because: the chemical properties of these two wastes differ significantly from the waste used to establish the current LDR standard for selenium (5.7 mg/L, as measured by the TCLP); and Chemical Waste Management, Inc. (CWM) has adequately demonstrated that the two wastes cannot be treated to meet this treatment standard. CWM intends to stabilize the wastes at their Kettleman City, California facility. If this proposal is finalized, CWM may treat these two specific wastes to alternate treatment standards of 51 mg/L, as measured by the TCLP, for the Owens-Brockway waste and 25 mg/L, as measured by the TCLP, for the St. Gobain waste. After treatment to these alternative selenium standards, CWM may dispose of the treated wastes in a RCRA Subtitle C landfill provided they meet the applicable LDR treatment standards for the other hazardous constituents in the wastes. We are proposing to grant this variance for three years. In the “Rules and Regulations” section of the Federal Register , we are publishing a direct final rule that would grant this site-specific treatment variance without prior proposal because we view this action as noncontroversial and we anticipate no significant adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this approach in the preamble to the direct final rule. If we receive significant adverse comment on the direct final rule, however, we will withdraw the direct final action and the treatment variance will not take effect. We will address all public comments, as appropriate, based on this proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this proposed variance must do so at this time.

Dates

Written comments must be received by June 27, 2002.

Supplementary Information

This document concerns a site-specific treatment variance from the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards for two selenium-bearing hazardous wastes to be treated by Chemical Waste Management, Inc. For further information, please see the information provided in the direct final action that is located in the “Rules and Regulations” section of this Federal Register publication. Electronic Submittal of Comments You may submit comments electronically by sending electronic mail through the Internet to: rcra-docket@epamail.epa.gov. You should identify comments in electronic format with the docket number F-2001-CWVP-FFFFF. You must submit all electronic comments as an ASCII (text) file, avoiding the use of special characters or any type of encryption. The official record for this action will be kept in the paper form. Accordingly, we will transfer all comments received electronically into paper form and place them in the official record which will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The official record is the paper record maintained at the RIC as described above. We may seek clarification of electronic comments that are garbled in transmission or during conversion to paper form. You should not electronically submit any confidential business information (CBI). You must submit an original and two copies of CBI under separate cover to: RCRA CBI Document Control Officer, Office of Solid Waste (5305W), U.S. EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. If you do not submit comments electronically, we are asking prospective commenters to voluntarily submit one additional copy of their comments on labeled personal computer diskettes in ASCII (text) format or a word processing format that can be converted to ASCII (text). It is essential that you specify on the disk label the word processing software and version/edition as well as the commenter's name. This will allow us to convert the comments into one of the word processing formats used by the Agency. Please use mailing envelopes designed to protect the diskettes. We emphasize that submission of diskettes is not mandatory, nor will it result in any advantage or disadvantage to any commenter. I. Description of Proposed Rule Today's notice proposes to continue for another three-year period a site-specific treatment variance for two selenium-bearing waste stream that will be treated by Chemical Waste Management, Inc. In the “Rules and Regulations” section of the Federal Register, we are issuing a direct final rule to grant this variance without prior proposal because we view this action as noncontroversial and anticipate no significant adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this approach in the preamble to the direct final rule, and do not believe it necessary to repeat those discussions here. If we receive significant adverse comment on the direct final rule, we will withdraw the direct final action and the treatment variance will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this proposed rule must do so at this time. For further information, please see the “Rules and Regulations” section of today's Federal Register publication. II. How Can I Influence EPA's Thinking on This Rule? In developing this rule, we tried to address the concerns of stakeholders. Your comments will help us improve this rule. We invite you to provide different views on options we propose, new approaches we have not considered, new data, how this rule may affect you, or other relevant information. We welcome your views on all aspects of this rule. Your comments will be most effective if you follow the suggestions below: • Explain your views as clearly as possible and why you feel that way. • Provide solid technical and cost data to support your views. • If you estimate potential costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate. • Tell us which parts you support, as well as those you disagree with. • Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. • Offer specific alternatives. • Refer your comments to specific sections of the proposal, such as the units or page numbers of the preamble, or the regulatory sections. • Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this notice. • Be sure to include the name, date, and docket number with your comments. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 268 Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: May 13, 2002. Michael H. Shapiro, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. [FR Doc. 02-13115 Filed 5-24-02; 8:45 am]