Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-05-23 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

472 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/05/23/02-12986·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-45954; File No. SR-NASD-2002-12] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Establishment of a Subordination Agreement Investor Disclosure Document May 17, 2002. On January 17, 2002, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary NASD Regulation, Inc.
(“NASD Regulation”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to require, as part of a subordination agreement, the execution of a Subordination Agreement Investor Disclosure Document (“Disclosure Document”). On March 21, 2002, NASD Regulation filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change with the Commission. 3 The proposed rule change, as amended by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on April 16, 2002. 4 The Commission received no comment letters on the proposal.
This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 In Amendment No. 1, NASD Regulation made certain clarifications to the Disclosure Document (“Amendment No. 1”). Letter from Patrice M. Gliniecki, Vice President and Acting General Counsel, NASD Regulation, to Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated March 21, 2002. 4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45721 (April 10, 2002), 67 FR 18661.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities association and, in particular, the requirements of section 15A of the Act 5 and the rules and regulations thereunder. Specifically, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, 6 which, among other things, requires that NASD's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Commission believes that the Disclosure Document should provide investors with an understanding of the key risks associated with loaning money or securities to a broker-dealer under a subordination agreements. 7 5 15 U.S.C. 78 *o* -3. 6 15 U.S.C. 78 *o* -3(b)(6). 7 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change and Amendment No. 1 thereto (File No.
SR-NASD-2002-12) are approved. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 9 9 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland Deputy Secretary [FR Doc. 02-12986 Filed 5-22-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
  • 15 USC 78
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cite15 USC 78
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.