Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-05-08 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of adequacy

544 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/05/08/02-11454·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Notice of adequacy
Citation: FR Doc. 02-11454 · Region 2 Docket No. NJ51-241 FRL-7208-2

Summary

In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for carbon monoxide (CO) in the submitted redesignation request and maintenance plan for the New Jersey portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island moderate CO nonattainment area are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that submitted State Implementation Plans (SIPs) cannot be used for conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of our finding, the New Jersey portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island CO nonattainment area must use the motor vehicle emission budget from this submitted redesignation request and maintenance plan for future conformity determinations.

Dates

This finding is effective May 23, 2002.

Supplementary Information

Background Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. EPA Region 2 sent a letter to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection on April 22, 2002 stating that the CO motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2007 and 2014 in the submitted redesignation request and maintenance plan (dated January 15, 2002) for the New Jersey portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island moderate CO nonattainment area are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. This finding will also be announced on EPA's conformity website: , (once there, click on the “Conformity” button, then look for “Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions for Conformity”). Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved. We have described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in guidance (May 14, 1999 memo titled “Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision”). We followed this guidance in making our adequacy determination. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. Dated: April 22, 2002. William J. Muszynski, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 02-11454 Filed 5-7-02; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)
  • 42 USC 7401-7671q
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of adequacy
Cite40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)
Cite42 USC 7401-7671q
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.