Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-05-02 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

489 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/05/02/02-10867

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-45838; File No. SR-NYSE-2001-40] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 Thereto, Regarding Method of Delivery of Annual Reports and Proxy Materials April 26, 2002. On October 11, 2001, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to specify that annual reports and proxy materials should be distributed in such format and by such methods as are permitted or required by applicable law and regulations (including any interpretations thereof by the Commission).
On January 15, 2002, 3 and March 5, 2002, 4 the Exchange amended the proposal to make technical changes to its rule text. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* letter to Nancy Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission, from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, dated January 11, 2002 (“Amendment No. 1”). 4 *See* letter to Nancy Sanow, Assistant Director, Division, Commission, from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, dated March 4, 2002 (“Amendment No. 2”).
The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on March 27, 2002. 5 The Commission received no comments on the proposal. 5 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45602 (March 20, 2002), 67 FR 14756. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange 6 and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the Act 7 and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 8 because it requires the Exchange's members to distribute annual reports and proxy materials in a manner that is consistent with federal securities laws. The Commission believes such consistency should foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. 6 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 7 15 U.S.C. 78f. 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 9 that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2001-40), as amended, be, and hereby is, approved. 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 10 10 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-10867 Filed 5-1-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.